BACKGROUND: Fat accumulation in muscle may contribute to age-related declines in muscle function and is indicated by reduced attenuation of x-rays by muscle tissue in computed tomography scans. Reduced trunk muscle attenuation is associated with poor physical function, low back pain, and increased hyperkyphosis in older adults. However, variations in trunk muscle attenuation with age, sex and between specific muscles have not been investigated. METHODS: A cross-sectional examination of trunk muscle attenuation in computed tomography scans was performed in 60 younger (35-50 years) and 60 older (75-87 years) adults randomly selected from participants in the Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Third Generation Multidetector Computed Tomography Study. Computed tomography attenuation of 11 trunk muscles was measured at vertebral levels T8 and L3, and the effects of age, sex, and specific muscle on computed tomography attenuation of trunk muscles were determined. RESULTS: Muscle attenuation varied by specific muscle (p < .001), was lower in older adults (p < .001), and was generally lower in women than in men (p < .001), although not in all muscles. Age-related differences in muscle attenuation varied with specific muscle (p < .001), with the largest age differences occurring in the paraspinal and abdominal muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk muscle attenuation is lower in older adults than in younger adults in both women and men, but such age-related differences vary widely between muscle groups. The reasons that some muscles exhibit larger age-related differences in fat content than others should be further explored to better understand age-related changes in functional capacity and postural stability.
BACKGROUND: Fat accumulation in muscle may contribute to age-related declines in muscle function and is indicated by reduced attenuation of x-rays by muscle tissue in computed tomography scans. Reduced trunk muscle attenuation is associated with poor physical function, low back pain, and increased hyperkyphosis in older adults. However, variations in trunk muscle attenuation with age, sex and between specific muscles have not been investigated. METHODS: A cross-sectional examination of trunk muscle attenuation in computed tomography scans was performed in 60 younger (35-50 years) and 60 older (75-87 years) adults randomly selected from participants in the Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Third Generation Multidetector Computed Tomography Study. Computed tomography attenuation of 11 trunk muscles was measured at vertebral levels T8 and L3, and the effects of age, sex, and specific muscle on computed tomography attenuation of trunk muscles were determined. RESULTS: Muscle attenuation varied by specific muscle (p < .001), was lower in older adults (p < .001), and was generally lower in women than in men (p < .001), although not in all muscles. Age-related differences in muscle attenuation varied with specific muscle (p < .001), with the largest age differences occurring in the paraspinal and abdominal muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk muscle attenuation is lower in older adults than in younger adults in both women and men, but such age-related differences vary widely between muscle groups. The reasons that some muscles exhibit larger age-related differences in fat content than others should be further explored to better understand age-related changes in functional capacity and postural stability.
Authors: Wendy Katzman; Peggy Cawthon; Gregory E Hicks; Eric Vittinghoff; John Shepherd; Jane A Cauley; Tamara Harris; Eleanor M Simonsick; Elsa Strotmeyer; Catherine Womack; Deborah M Kado Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Bret H Goodpaster; Anne B Newman; Michael Nevitt; Elizabeth Stamm; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Harm van Baar; S Beijer; M J L Bours; M P Weijenberg; M van Zutphen; F J B van Duijnhoven; G D Slooter; J F M Pruijt; J J Dronkers; A Haringhuizen; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; B M E Hansson; J H W de Wilt; E Kampman; R M Winkels Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Dennis E Anderson; Jonathan F Bean; Nicole E Holt; John C Keel; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Alexander G Bruno; Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Brett T Allaire; Kelsey R Velie; M Clara De Paolis Kaluza; Dennis E Anderson; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Kathelijn Sophie Versteeg; Susanne Blauwhoff-Buskermolen; Laurien M Buffart; Marian A E de van der Schueren; Jacqueline A E Langius; Henk M W Verheul; Andrea B Maier; Inge R Konings Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-12-08
Authors: Katelyn A Burkhart; Alexander G Bruno; Mary L Bouxsein; Jonathan F Bean; Dennis E Anderson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Amanda L Lorbergs; Brett T Allaire; Laiji Yang; Douglas P Kiel; L Adrienne Cupples; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Thomas G Travison; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth J Samelson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Michelle S Yau; Serkalem Demissie; Yanhua Zhou; Dennis E Anderson; Amanda L Lorbergs; Douglas P Kiel; Brett T Allaire; Laiji Yang; L Adrienne Cupples; Thomas G Travison; Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik; Elizabeth J Samelson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 6.741