Barbara A Lewis1, Sonia Minnes2, Meeyoung O Min2, Elizabeth J Short3, Miaoping Wu2, Adelaide Lang2, Paul Weishampel2, Lynn T Singer4. 1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, United States. Electronic address: bxl@case.edu. 2. Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, United States. 3. Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, United States. 4. Departments of Pediatrics and Environmental Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors aimed to examine the association of a range of blood lead levels on language skills assessed at 4, 6, 10 and 12 years of age using a prospective longitudinal design controlling for potential confounding variables including maternal vocabulary, caregiver's psychological distress and symptomatology, child's race and prenatal drug exposure. METHODS: The participants (N = 278) were a subsample of a large longitudinal study that examined the association of prenatal drug exposure on children who were followed prospectively from birth and assessed for receptive and expressive language skills at 4, 6, 10 and 12 years of age. Blood lead levels were determined at 4-years of age by atomic absorption spectrometry. A mixed model approach with restricted maximum likelihood procedures was used to assess the association of lead on language outcomes. RESULTS: Longitudinal mixed model analyses suggested a negative effect of lead exposure on both receptive and expressive language, with the adverse outcomes of lead exposure appearing to become more prominent at 10 and 12 years. Higher caregiver vocabulary was positively associated with child's language scores whereas caregiver psychological distress appeared to negatively affect language scores. Prenatal drug exposure was not related to the effects of lead on language skills. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that elevated blood lead levels occurring early in life may be associated with poorer language skills at older ages. A language rich environment may minimize the negative influence of early lead exposure on language skills, with psychological distress seemingly exacerbating the negative outcome.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors aimed to examine the association of a range of blood lead levels on language skills assessed at 4, 6, 10 and 12 years of age using a prospective longitudinal design controlling for potential confounding variables including maternal vocabulary, caregiver's psychological distress and symptomatology, child's race and prenatal drug exposure. METHODS: The participants (N = 278) were a subsample of a large longitudinal study that examined the association of prenatal drug exposure on children who were followed prospectively from birth and assessed for receptive and expressive language skills at 4, 6, 10 and 12 years of age. Blood lead levels were determined at 4-years of age by atomic absorption spectrometry. A mixed model approach with restricted maximum likelihood procedures was used to assess the association of lead on language outcomes. RESULTS: Longitudinal mixed model analyses suggested a negative effect of lead exposure on both receptive and expressive language, with the adverse outcomes of lead exposure appearing to become more prominent at 10 and 12 years. Higher caregiver vocabulary was positively associated with child's language scores whereas caregiver psychological distress appeared to negatively affect language scores. Prenatal drug exposure was not related to the effects of lead on language skills. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that elevated blood lead levels occurring early in life may be associated with poorer language skills at older ages. A language rich environment may minimize the negative influence of early lead exposure on language skills, with psychological distress seemingly exacerbating the negative outcome.
Authors: Laura Hubbs-Tait; Afework Mulugeta; Alemtsehay Bogale; Tay S Kennedy; Eric R Baker; Barbara J Stoecker Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Jane Khoury; Kimberly Yolton; Peter Baghurst; David C Bellinger; Richard L Canfield; Kim N Dietrich; Robert Bornschein; Tom Greene; Stephen J Rothenberg; Herbert L Needleman; Lourdes Schnaas; Gail Wasserman; Joseph Graziano; Russell Roberts Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Meeyoung O Min; Barbara A Lewis; Sonia Minnes; Kwynn M Gonzalez-Pons; June-Yung Kim; Lynn T Singer Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 6.498