Literature DB >> 30868350

Can narrowing of the mandibular canal on pre-operative panoramic radiography predict close anatomical contact of the mandibular canal with the mandibular third molar? A meta-analysis.

Qin Liye1, Zhou Zhongwei2, Sun Xiaojuan3, Wang Min1, Liu Pingping1, Cao Kun4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Inferior alveolar nerve injury is a common complication following mandibular third molar extraction. Accurate pre-operative assessment of the anatomical relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal could help to avoid this injury. We performed a eta-analysis to investigate whether panoramic radiography could be used to assess the relationship between these two structures.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, SpringerLink, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched independently by two researchers from January 2008 to May 2018.
RESULTS: Seven articles were identified. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software tools. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.19 (95%CI:0.16-0.22) and 0.90 (95%CI:0.88-0.92), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 2.34 (95%CI:1.42-3.87) and 0.86 (95%CI:0.78-0.96), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.86 (95%CI:0.78-0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: According to the sign of narrowing of the mandibular canal, panoramic radiology used to assess the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal yielded high specificity, but low sensitivity. The absence of narrowing of the mandibular canal indicated that there was no close contact between these two structures. However, the presence of narrowing of the mandibular canal could not be used to accurately evaluate the relationship between these two structures, although it might indicate a high probability of close anatomical contact between these two structures. Further tests should be performed for providing adequate pre-operative risk assessment while planning for the surgery to reduce the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury, as well as to enable an open discussion with the patient to decrease the risk of medical disputes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mandibular canal; Mandibular third molar; Meta-analysis; Panoramic radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30868350     DOI: 10.1007/s11282-019-00375-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Radiol        ISSN: 0911-6028            Impact factor:   1.852


  16 in total

1.  What has been the United Kingdom's experience with retention of third molars?

Authors:  Tara Renton; Mustafa Al-Haboubi; Allan Pau; Jonathan Shepherd; Jennifer E Gallagher
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Use of panoramic radiography to predict postsurgical sensory impairment following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Chuan-Kuei Huang; Man-Tin Lui; Dong-Hui Cheng
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 3.  Risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury with coronectomy vs surgical extraction of mandibular third molars-A comparison of two techniques and review of the literature.

Authors:  A S Ali; J A Benton; J M Yates
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population.

Authors:  Kate L Winstanley; Lisa M Otway; Lionel Thompson; Zoe H Brook; Nigel King; Bernard Koong; Michael O'Halloran
Journal:  J Investig Clin Dent       Date:  2018-02-04

5.  Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction?

Authors:  Jin-Woo Kim; In-Ho Cha; Sun-Jong Kim; Myung-Rae Kim
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Analysis and evaluation of relative positions of mandibular third molar and mandibular canal impacts.

Authors:  Hang-Gul Kim; Jae-Hoon Lee
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-26

7.  Comparisons of the Computed Tomographic Scan and Panoramic Radiography Before Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Surgery.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Wanglun Diao; Lan Luo; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-21

8.  Accuracy of panoramic radiographic predictor signs in the assessment of proximity of impacted third molars with the mandibular canal.

Authors:  Sara M Elkhateeb; Sally S Awad
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-24

9.  Correlation of panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of a superimposed relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Authors:  Yun-Hoa Jung; Kyung-Soo Nah; Bong-Hae Cho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-09-21

10.  Coronectomy of Deeply Impacted Lower Third Molar: Incidence of Outcomes and Complications after One Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje; Guido Heijsters; Ahmed Sobhy Salem; Sarah Van Slycke; Serge Schepers; Constantinus Politis; Luc Vrielinck
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2015-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.