Literature DB >> 22899107

A study investigating the validity of modified Tokuhashi score to decide surgical intervention in patients with metastatic spinal cancer.

Harinder Gakhar1, Girish N Swamy, Rajendranath Bommireddy, Denis Calthorpe, Zdenek Klezl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Predicted survival of a patient is the most important parameter that helps to guide the treatment of a patient with metastatic spinal cancer. We aimed to investigate the reliability of modified Tokuhashi score in the decision-making process in patients with metastatic spinal cancer.
METHODS: We performed a review of our prospectively collected Metastatic Cancer Database over a period of 4 years (2007-2010). Ninety consecutive patients who were treated for metastatic spinal cancer were enrolled. Data review included demographic details, source of primary cancer, duration of symptoms, location of metastases, calculated Karnofsky's performance status, and calculated survival based on modified Tokuhashi score. We divided the patients into 3 groups. Group A included patients with expected survival less than 6 months. Group B included patients with expected survival between 6 and 12 months. Group C included patients whose expected survival was more than 12 months. We compared the calculated expected survival to the actual survival in all three groups with all patients following up to a minimum of 1 year or until death. Statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test and the Fisher Exact test.
RESULTS: The survival prediction in group C was significantly accurate in 80.9 % patients (P = 0.027). However, in groups A and B, only 36.1 and 9.1 % patients survived, respectively, as per predicted. (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude from this study that, when used alone, modified Tokuhashi score may not be a reliable tool to predict survival in all patient groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22899107      PMCID: PMC3585654          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2480-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

1.  Vertebral metastases: a critical appreciation of the preoperative prognostic tokuhashi score in a series of 71 cases.

Authors:  E A Enkaoua; L Doursounian; G Chatellier; F Mabesoone; T Aimard; G Saillant
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.

Authors:  David Choi; A Crockard; C Bunger; J Harms; N Kawahara; C Mazel; R Melcher; K Tomita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiromi Matsuzaki; Hiroshi Oda; Masashi Oshima; Junnosuke Ryu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Metastatic disease of the spine.

Authors:  K D Harrington
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Surgical strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; T Kobayashi; A Yoshida; H Murakami; T Akamaru
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Actual and predicted survival time of patients with spinal metastases of lung cancer: evaluation of the robustness of the Tokuhashi score.

Authors:  Christian Hessler; Eik Vettorazzi; Juergen Madert; Carsten Bokemeyer; Jens Panse
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Survival prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastases.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital; Rachid Salmi; Abou Diallo; Gerald M Quan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Y Tokuhashi; H Matsuzaki; S Toriyama; H Kawano; S Ohsaka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Andreas Leithner; Roman Radl; Gerald Gruber; Markus Hochegger; Katharina Leithner; Heike Welkerling; Peter Rehak; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease.

Authors:  K W Hammerberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Which one is a valuable surrogate for predicting survival between Tomita and Tokuhashi scores in patients with spinal metastases? A meta-analysis for diagnostic test accuracy and individual participant data analysis.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Ki-jeong Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hyun-Jib Kim; Sang Ryong Jeon; Ung-Kyu Chang; Sun-Ho Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Haroon Majeed; Dan Zhang; Gwenaelle Gravis; Christine Wibmer; Naresh Kumar; Kyung Yun Moon; Jin Hoon Park; Emeline Tabouret; Stephane Fuentes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Accuracy of Tokuhashi score system in predicting survival of lung cancer patients with vertebral metastasis.

Authors:  Wenxi Yu; Lina Tang; Feng Lin; Yang Yao; Zan Shen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  The Tokuhashi score: effectiveness and pitfalls.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Jesse Skoch; Christina M Walter; Mohammad Torabi; Mark Borgstrom; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI): an external validation study.

Authors:  Christina Fleming; Joseph F Baker; Shane C O'Neill; Fiachra E Rowan; Damien P Byrne; Keith Synnott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Bouthors; S Prost; C Court; B Blondel; Y P Charles; S Fuentes; H P Mousselard; C Mazel; C H Flouzat-Lachaniette; P Bonnevialle; F Saihlan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Moderate precision of prognostic scoring systems in a consecutive, prospective cohort of 544 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Søren Schmidt Morgen; Dennis Hallager Nielsen; Claus Falck Larsen; Rikke Søgaard; Svend Aage Engelholm; Benny Dahl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Study investigating the role of skeletal muscle mass estimation in metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  H Gakhar; A Dhillon; J Blackwell; K Hussain; R Bommireddy; Z Klezl; J Williams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Usefulness of Tokuhashi Score in Survival Prediction of Patients Operated for Vertebral Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Marcelo Gruenberg; Maximiliano E Mereles; Gastón O Camino Willhuber; Marcelo Valacco; Matias G Petracchi; Carlos A Solá
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-11

10.  Who are the Best Candidates for Decompressive Surgery and Spine Stabilization in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression?: A New Scoring System.

Authors:  Mingxing Lei; Jianjie Li; Yaosheng Liu; Weigang Jiang; Shubin Liu; Shiguo Zhou
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.