Literature DB >> 1279815

Surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease.

K W Hammerberg1.   

Abstract

The results of surgical intervention for metastatic disease on 56 consecutive patients since 1980 were reviewed. Two patients underwent a second procedure to stabilize remote levels of spinal involvement, for a total of 58 surgeries. All 56 patients presented with pain. After surgery, significant relief was noted by 51 (91%). Twenty-seven patients presented with neurologic compromise. After operation, neurologic improvement was noted in 20 (74%). No patient's neurologic function deteriorated secondary to surgical intervention. Twenty-one patients were bedridden before surgery secondary to pain or paresis. After operation, improvement in activity level was achieved in 16 (76%) of these patients. In summary, the goal of surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease is to improve the quality of the remaining life, by the relief of pain and preservation or restoration of neurologic function. The dismal consequences of prolonged bed rest, paraplegia, and a painful premature demise can be avoided with thoughtful and timely surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1279815     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199210000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Surgical disorders of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a guide for neurologists.

Authors:  Nitin Patel
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Cervical spine metastases: techniques for anterior reconstruction and stabilization.

Authors:  Christina M Sayama; Meic H Schmidt; Erica F Bisson
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease.

Authors:  Paul Klimo; Clinton J Thompson; John R W Kestle; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study.

Authors:  A C Disch; K D Schaser; I Melcher; A Luzzati; F Feraboli; W Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Surgical indications and prognosis in spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Nanassis; C Alexiadou-Rudolf; J Rudolf; R A Frowein
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  L Alvarez; A Pérez-Higueras; D Quiñones; E Calvo; R E Rossi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical management of spinal metastases.

Authors:  F V Orcutt
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-10

8.  Treatment of spinal epidural compression due to hematological malignancies: a single institution's retrospective experience.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Jérôme Allain; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Alexandre Poignard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Clinical outcome of metastatic spinal cord compression treated with surgical excision ± radiation versus radiation therapy alone: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Jaehon M Kim; Elena Losina; Christopher M Bono; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Jamie E Collins; Jeffrey N Katz; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  [Surgical management of vertebral column metastatic disease].

Authors:  K-D Schaser; I Melcher; T Mittlmeier; A Schulz; J H Seemann; N P Haas; A C Disch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.