Literature DB >> 22898197

Preliminary results of 45 patients with trigeminal neuralgia treated with radiosurgery compared to hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, using a dedicated linear accelerator.

Mario Francesco Fraioli1, Lidia Strigari, Chiara Fraioli, Mario Lecce, Damiano Lisciani.   

Abstract

Radiosurgery (RS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) were performed in 23 and 22 patients respectively for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. RS and HSRT were performed with a dedicated linear accelerator (LINAC): an invasive frame (for RS) or a relocatable stereotactic frame fitted with a thermoplastic mask and bite blocks (HSRT) were used for positioning patients. The RS treatment delivered 40 Gy in a single fraction, or for HSRT, the equivalent radiobiological fractionated dose - a total of 72 Gy in six fractions. The target (the retrogasserian cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve) was identified by fusion of CT scans with 1-mm-thick T2-weighted MRI, and the radiant dose was delivered by a 10-mm-diameter cylindrical collimator. The results were evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute pain scale during follow-up (mean 3.9 years). The 95% isodose was applied to the entire target volume. After RS (23 patients), Class 1 results were observed in 10 patients; Class II in nine, Class IIIa in two, Class IIIb in one, and Class V results in one patient. Facial numbness occurred in two (8.7%) patients, and the trigeminal neuralgia recurred in two patients (8.7%). Following HSRT (22 patients), Class I results were achieved in eight patients, Class II in eight, Class IIIa in four, and Class IIIb in two patients; recurrence occurred in six (27.5%), and there were no complications. Thus, both RS and HSRT provided effective and safe therapy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Patients who underwent RS experienced better pain relief and a lower recurrence rate, whereas those who underwent HRST had no side effects, and in particular, no facial numbness.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898197     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  7 in total

Review 1.  Update on Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Alexander X Tai; Vikram V Nayar
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  [Radiosurgery and surgical neurovascular decompression are almost equal for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia].

Authors:  Christoph Straube; Ehab Shiban; Bernhard Meyer; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparative analysis between 5 mm and 7.5 mm collimators in CyberKnife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  H Sudahar; P G G Kurup; V Murali; J Velmurugan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-07

4.  Microvascular Decompression Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Ian Berger; Nikhil Nayak; James Schuster; John Lee; Sherman Stein; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-01-26

Review 5.  Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.

Authors:  Carolina Venda Nova; Joanna M Zakrzewska; Sarah R Baker; Richeal Ni Riordain
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-01-27

6.  Truebeam Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Preliminary Results at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Mena G Kerolus; Neilayan Sen; Sonal Mayekar; Alistar Templeton; Julius Turian; Aidnag Diaz; Lorenzo Munoz; Richard W Byrne; Sepehr Sani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 7.  Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Yad Ram Yadav; Yadav Nishtha; Pande Sonjjay; Parihar Vijay; Ratre Shailendra; Khare Yatin
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.