Alexander X Tai1, Vikram V Nayar2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, PHC 7, Washington, DC, 20007, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, PHC 7, Washington, DC, 20007, USA. vikram.v.nayar@gunet.georgetown.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review current treatments for trigeminal neuralgia, with an emphasis on determining which patients may benefit from neurosurgical procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: A detailed history is the most helpful tool for diagnosing trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and predicting response to neurosurgical treatments. Patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia will describe severe, unilateral, intermittent facial pain that is triggered by innocuous sensory stimuli. In most cases, pain is caused by compression of the trigeminal nerve by a blood vessel near the brainstem. Magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to rule out TN secondary to multiple sclerosis or tumor. Modern high-resolution T2 images may demonstrate neurovascular contact, particularly when analyzed by a neurosurgeon with expertise in TN. Initial management involves a trial of medication, usually carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is safe and effective surgery, for patients with classic TN related to neurovascular compression. For patients with TN secondary to multiple sclerosis, and for patients who are otherwise poor candidates for MVD, neurosurgical options include percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy and radiosurgery. Neurosurgical procedures are less effective in relieving atypical facial pain. In the clinical evaluation of a patient with facial pain, it is important to distinguish classic trigeminal neuralgia from atypical facial pain. A patient with classic trigeminal neuralgia would benefit from neurosurgical consultation. The advent of high-resolution MRI and MRA sequences now allows a neurosurgeon to detect when neurovascular compression is likely, and select the optimal procedure for treatment.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review current treatments for trigeminal neuralgia, with an emphasis on determining which patients may benefit from neurosurgical procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: A detailed history is the most helpful tool for diagnosing trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and predicting response to neurosurgical treatments. Patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia will describe severe, unilateral, intermittent facial pain that is triggered by innocuous sensory stimuli. In most cases, pain is caused by compression of the trigeminal nerve by a blood vessel near the brainstem. Magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to rule out TN secondary to multiple sclerosis or tumor. Modern high-resolution T2 images may demonstrate neurovascular contact, particularly when analyzed by a neurosurgeon with expertise in TN. Initial management involves a trial of medication, usually carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is safe and effective surgery, for patients with classic TN related to neurovascular compression. For patients with TN secondary to multiple sclerosis, and for patients who are otherwise poor candidates for MVD, neurosurgical options include percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy and radiosurgery. Neurosurgical procedures are less effective in relieving atypical facial pain. In the clinical evaluation of a patient with facial pain, it is important to distinguish classic trigeminal neuralgia from atypical facial pain. A patient with classic trigeminal neuralgia would benefit from neurosurgical consultation. The advent of high-resolution MRI and MRA sequences now allows a neurosurgeon to detect when neurovascular compression is likely, and select the optimal procedure for treatment.
Authors: Nicolas Massager; José Lorenzoni; Daniel Devriendt; Françoise Desmedt; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Sana D Karam; Alexander Tai; James W Snider; Shilpa Bhatia; Edward J Bedrick; Abdul Rashid; Ann Jay; Christopher Kalhorn; Nathan Nair; K William Harter; Sean P Collins; Walter Jean Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-12-14 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Annie E Arrighi-Allisan; Bradley N Delman; John W Rutland; Amy Yao; Judy Alper; Kuang-Han Huang; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 2.104