Literature DB >> 22894998

New trends in cranio-orbital and midface distraction for craniofacial dysostosis.

Richard A Hopper1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Syndromic craniofacial dysostosis remains one of the most challenging diagnoses in congenital craniomaxillofacial surgery. Distraction osteogenesis has held the promise of greater facial movements with improved stability, less morbidity and more favorable functional and esthetic outcomes. Current literature is starting to determine whether this promise is being fulfilled. RECENT
FINDINGS: The current trend in the literature is increasing indications for distraction in treating syndromic synostosis. Posterior vault, anterior vault, early monobloc and segmental Lefort distraction techniques are being advocated as alternatives to traditional surgeries. Outcome analysis of distraction techniques is becoming more common, especially in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea and advancement stability.
SUMMARY: Distraction osteogenesis has challenged, and in many centers modified, the treatment algorithms for craniofacial dysostoses that had been based on traditional osteotomy techniques. In some cases, distraction osteogenesis has encouraged earlier, more aggressive surgeries; in others, it has served as a temporizing measure to allow subsequent traditional surgeries to be performed at a more favorable age. As craniofacial distraction osteogenesis evolves and we become more critical in our outcome analysis, we may find more favorable long-term results compared with traditional techniques in aspects such as premature aging, bone healing and degree of advancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894998     DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283543a43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  6 in total

1.  Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction.

Authors:  Cristiano Tonello; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio C O Ruellas; Nivaldo Alonso
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  The usage of the three-dimension distractor in the NAVID system for plagiocephaly-three case reports.

Authors:  Hirokatsu Osawa; Mihoko Kato; Masamune Nagakura; Tsuyoshi Morishita; Goro Kondo; Michihiro Kurimoto
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Cranial distraction osteogenesis: a proposal of minimal consolidation period.

Authors:  Jung Won Choi; Ji Yeoun Lee; Ji Hoon Phi; Seung-Ki Kim; Tae Hyun Choi; Sukwha Kim; Kyu-Chang Wang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Expansion and compression distraction osteogenesis based on volumetric and neurodevelopmental analysis in sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Myung Chul Lee; Kyu Won Shim; Eun Kyung Park; In Sik Yun; Dong Seok Kim; Yong Oock Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Individualized therapy for treating obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric Crouzon syndrome patients.

Authors:  Wenwen Yu; Meng Wang; Kan Yao; Ming Cai; Hongxia Sun; Liyan Lu; Min Zhu; Xiaofeng Lu
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 6.  Craniofacial syndromes and sleep-related breathing disorders.

Authors:  Hui-Leng Tan; Leila Kheirandish-Gozal; François Abel; David Gozal
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 11.609

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.