Literature DB >> 25503404

Cranial distraction osteogenesis: a proposal of minimal consolidation period.

Jung Won Choi1, Ji Yeoun Lee, Ji Hoon Phi, Seung-Ki Kim, Tae Hyun Choi, Sukwha Kim, Kyu-Chang Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cranial distraction osteogenesis (DO) has many advantages for correcting skull deformities: Thus, DO is extensively used for the treatment of skull deformities. However, diverse, unexpected complications are associated with this procedure. In this study, we present the surgical outcomes and complications of DO. Moreover, we propose a modified protocol for DO to reduce complications.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study on managed patients that underwent DO between March 2008 and May 2013. Their clinical courses were reviewed. Distraction protocols were individually inspected, and the final surgical outcomes, including complications, were evaluated.
RESULTS: During the study period, a total of ten patients (seven boys and three girls) were treated at our institute. The median distraction period was 20.5 days (ranging from 17 to 50 days). The range of total distraction length was 19-22 mm. The median consolidation period was 96 days (ranging from 0 to 343 days). All patients achieved the goals of distraction. At follow-up evaluations, all patients, except one, showed good surgical outcomes in both head shape and neurologic symptoms. There were six patients with wound complications during the treatment period. Among them, the distractors were removed early in three patients. Interestingly, even these three patients, without a sufficient consolidation period, showed good outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although DO has many merits for correcting skull deformities, it frequently causes severe wound complications. To reduce these complications, we propose a modified protocol with a minimal or even no consolidation period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25503404     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-014-2607-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  21 in total

1.  Posterior calvarial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Nicholas White; Martin Evans; M Stephen Dover; Peter Noons; Guirish Solanki; Hiroshi Nishikawa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.

Authors:  J G McCarthy; J Schreiber; N Karp; C H Thorne; B H Grayson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Posterior cranial vault expansion performed with rapid distraction and time-reduced consolidation in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Daniel Nowinski; Daniel Saiepour; Junnu Leikola; Elias Messo; Pelle Nilsson; Per Enblad
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Posterior cranial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher A Derderian; Nicholas Bastidas; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Distraction vs remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Seong-Woong Kim; Kyu-Won Shim; Nick Plesnila; Yong-Oock Kim; Joong-Uhn Choi; Dong-Seok Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Monobloc and facial bipartition distraction with internal devices.

Authors:  S R Cohen; W Boydston; R Hudgins; F D Burstein
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Complications associated with gradual cranial vault distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Yonehara; Shinichi Hirabayashi; Yasushi Sugawara; Atsushi Sakurai; Kiyonori Harii
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Posterior calvarial distraction in craniosynostosis - an evolving technique.

Authors:  Akira Wiberg; Shailendra Magdum; Peter G Richards; Jayaratnam Jayamohan; Steven A Wall; David Johnson
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Indication for and surgical outcomes of the distraction method in various types of craniosynostosis. Advantages, disadvantages, and current concepts for surgical strategy in the treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Yuichiro Nonaka; Shizuo Oi; Takeshi Miyawaki; Akihiko Shinoda; Kunihiro Kurihara
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  The classic: On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. 1905.

Authors:  Alessandro Codivilla
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.