Literature DB >> 22890832

Perception of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for special processing.

Hsiao-Wei Tu1, Robert J Dooling.   

Abstract

The long, rambling warble song of male budgerigars is composed of a large number of acoustically complex elements uttered in streams lasting minutes a time and accompanied by various courtship behaviors. Warble song has no obvious sequential structure or patterned repetition of elements, raising questions as to which aspects of it are perceptually salient, whether budgerigars can detect changes in natural warble streams, and to what extent these capabilities are species-specific. Using operant conditioning and a psychophysical paradigm, we examined the sensitivity of budgerigars, canaries, and zebra finches to changes in long (>6 min) natural warble sequences of a male budgerigar. All three species could detect a single insertion of pure tones, zebra finch song syllables, budgerigar contact calls, or warble elements from another budgerigar's warble. In each case, budgerigars were more sensitive to these changes than were canaries or finches. When warble elements from the ongoing warble stream were used as targets and inserted, out of order, into the natural warble stream so that the only cue available was the violation of the natural ordering of warble elements, only budgerigars performed above chance. When the experiment was repeated with all the ongoing warble stream elements presented in random order, the performance of budgerigars fell to chance. These results show species-specific advantages in budgerigars for detecting acoustic changes in natural warble sequences and indicate at least a limited sensitivity to sequential rules governing the structure of their species-specific warble songs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890832      PMCID: PMC3474876          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0539-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  20 in total

1.  Brain stem evoked response to forward and reversed speech in humans.

Authors:  Gary C Galbraith; Elizabeth M Amaya; Jacinta M Diaz de Rivera; Namee M Donan; Mylien T Duong; Jeffrey N Hsu; Kim Tran; Lian P Tsang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants.

Authors:  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Stanislas Dehaene; Lucie Hertz-Pannier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Kimberly M Fenn; Daniel Margoliash; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels?

Authors:  P Marler
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.548

5.  A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions.

Authors:  V Gourevitch; E Galanter
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules.

Authors:  Kentaro Abe; Dai Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Learned vocalizations in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the relationship between contact calls and warble song.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Michael S Osmanski; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species.

Authors:  Caroline A A van Heijningen; Jos de Visser; Willem Zuidema; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Vocal learning in birds and humans.

Authors:  Linda Wilbrecht; Fernando Nottebohm
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2003

10.  Social interaction shapes babbling: testing parallels between birdsong and speech.

Authors:  Michael H Goldstein; Andrew P King; Meredith J West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Daniel T Blumstein; Marie A Roch; Çağlar Akçay; Gregory Backus; Mark A Bee; Kirsten Bohn; Yan Cao; Gerald Carter; Cristiane Cäsar; Michael Coen; Stacy L DeRuiter; Laurance Doyle; Shimon Edelman; Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho; Todd M Freeberg; Ellen C Garland; Morgan Gustison; Heidi E Harley; Chloé Huetz; Melissa Hughes; Julia Hyland Bruno; Amiyaal Ilany; Dezhe Z Jin; Michael Johnson; Chenghui Ju; Jeremy Karnowski; Bernard Lohr; Marta B Manser; Brenda McCowan; Eduardo Mercado; Peter M Narins; Alex Piel; Megan Rice; Roberta Salmi; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Laela Sayigh; Yu Shiu; Charles Taylor; Edgar E Vallejo; Sara Waller; Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-11-26

2.  How canaries listen to their song: Species-specific shape of auditory perception.

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; Shelby L Lawson; Robert J Dooling; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Budgerigars and zebra finches differ in how they generalize in an artificial grammar learning experiment.

Authors:  Michelle J Spierings; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Sound sequences in birdsong: how much do birds really care?

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; William J Idsardi; Gregory F Ball; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Relative salience of syllable structure and syllable order in zebra finch song.

Authors:  Shelby L Lawson; Adam R Fishbein; Nora H Prior; Gregory F Ball; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Does audience affect the structure of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)?

Authors:  Cole Tobin; Angela Medina-García; Gregory M Kohn; Timothy F Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Universal principles underlying segmental structures in parrot song and human speech.

Authors:  Dan C Mann; W Tecumseh Fitch; Hsiao-Wei Tu; Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Switching costs in stochastic environments drive the emergence of matching behaviour in animal decision-making through the promotion of reward learning strategies.

Authors:  Nan Lyu; Yunbiao Hu; Jiahua Zhang; Huw Lloyd; Yue-Hua Sun; Yi Tao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.