Literature DB >> 22890606

Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis.

Hiroshi Ohtani1, Yutaka Tamamori, Yuichi Arimoto, Yukio Nishiguchi, Kiyoshi Maeda, Kosei Hirakawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of patients with acute appendicitis.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register for relevant papers published between January 1990 and February 2012. We analyzed 22 outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis.
RESULTS: We identified 39 papers reporting results from randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for acute appendicitis. Our meta-analysis included 5,896 patients with acute appendicitis; 2,847 had undergone laparoscopic surgery, and 3,049 had undergone open surgery. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery was associated with longer operative time (by 13.12 min). However, compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis was associated with earlier resumption of liquid and solid intake; shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay; a reduction in dose numbers of parenteral and oral analgesics; earlier return to normal activity, work, and normal life; decreased occurrence of wound infection; a better cosmesis; and similar hospital charges.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery may now be the standard treatment for acute appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890606     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1972-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  48 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A G Pedersen; O B Petersen; P Wara; H Rønning; N Qvist; S Laurberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  M M Ozmen; B Zülfikaroğlu; A Tanik; I T Kale
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  E Macarulla; J Vallet; J M Abad; H Hussein; E Fernández; B Nieto
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1997-08

4.  A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses.

Authors:  K H Long; M P Bannon; S P Zietlow; E R Helgeson; W S Harmsen; C D Smith; D M Ilstrup; Y Baerga-Varela; M G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients.

Authors:  R Hart; C Rajgopal; A Plewes; J Sweeney; W Davies; D Gray; B Taylor
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A Hellberg; C Rudberg; E Kullman; L Enochsson; G Fenyö; H Graffner; B Hallerbäck; B Johansson; B Anderberg; J Wenner; I Ringqvist; S Sörensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  R C Frazee; J W Roberts; R E Symmonds; S K Snyder; J C Hendricks; R W Smith; M D Custer; J B Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in females with a clinical diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Abdulrahman S Al-Mulhim; Faisal M Al-Mulhim; Abdulmohsen A Al-Suwaiygh; Nabil A Al-Masaud
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures.

Authors:  Jawad Khalil; Roohul Muqim; Mohammad Rafique; Mansoor Khan
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.485

View more
  45 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Buia; Florian Stockhausen; Ernst Hanisch
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-12-26

2.  New strategy during complicated open appendectomy: convert open operation to laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jin-Hui Zhu; Wei Li; Kai Yu; Jia Wu; Yun Ji; Jian-Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chaorong Xue; Bingqiang Lin; Zhengyuan Huang; Zhi Chen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is laparoscopic appendectomy going to be standard procedure for acute appendicitis; a 5-year single center experience with 1,788 patients.

Authors:  M A Bozkurt; M G Unsal; S Kapan; M Gonenc; M Dogan; M U Kalayci; H Alis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Open appendectomy with invagination of the stump rather than laparoscopic appendectomy-are we really serious?

Authors:  Deepraj S Bhandarkar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Meta-analysis of randomised trials on laparoscopic versus open surgery for acute appendicitis: has firm evidence been reached?

Authors:  Luit Penninga; Christian Gluud; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Yan Xiao; Gang Shi; Jin Zhang; Jian-Guo Cao; Li-Jun Liu; Ting-Hao Chen; Zhi-Zhou Li; Hong Wang; Han Zhang; Zhao-Fen Lin; Jun-Hua Lu; Tian Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Efficacy of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy for appendicitis: a four-year experience at a single center.

Authors:  Noriaki Koizumi; Hiroki Kobayashi; Yuen Nakase; Tsuyoshi Takagi; Kanehisa Fukumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Gasless transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy as a safe and cost-effective alternative surgical procedure for mild acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Koji Munakata; Mamoru Uemura; Junzo Shimizu; Masakazu Miyake; Taishi Hata; Kimimasa Ikeda; Keizo Dono; Masashi Kitada; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.