Literature DB >> 22886359

Influence of hospital surgical volume of radical prostatectomy on quality of perioperative care.

Yoshikatsu Nojiri1, Kikuo Okamura, Yoshinori Tanaka, Hitoshi Yanaihara, Naoto Sassa, Ryohei Hattori, Jiroh Machida, Katsuyoshi Hashine, Tadashi Matsuda, Yoichi Arai, Seiji Naito, Tomonori Hasegawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the relationships between hospital surgical volume, surgical outcome, care plans indicated in critical pathways and actual perioperative care using data from a nationwide survey for radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, urologists from 155 hospitals in Japan cooperated in submitting the data of 4,029 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in 2007, and the perioperative care plan in critical pathways. Of these, we analyzed data of 3,499 patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy and minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Increasing hospital volume was associated with decreased proportion of open radical prostatectomy (p < 0.001). As the hospital volume increased, surgical duration was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and bleeding volume decreased (p < 0.004). Analyses of perioperative care suggested that low-volume hospitals (<15 patients annually) were likely to have longer care than medium-volume (15-29 patients per year) or high-volume (≥30 patients per year) hospitals, and the length of actual care was prolonged in the low-volume hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the occurrence of postoperative complications was significantly associated with surgeon's volume (p = 0.004), patient age (p = 0.001), preoperative anticoagulant therapy (p = 0.045), coexistent diabetes mellitus (p = 0.009), surgical duration (p = 0.002) and bleeding volume (p < 0.001), but not hospital volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Urologists in high-volume hospitals appeared to attempt new types of surgery. Hospital surgical volume was strongly associated with the surgical duration, bleeding volume and planned and actual perioperative care; however, it was not associated with postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886359     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-012-0455-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  15 in total

1.  Population-based study of relationships between hospital volume of prostatectomies, patient outcomes, and length of hospital stay.

Authors:  S L Yao; G Lu-Yao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Authors:  M M Chowdhury; H Dagash; A Pierro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Impact of the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination-based payment system in Japan.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Ping Li; Ling Chen; Ken Kato; Makoto Kobayashi; Kazunobu Yamauchi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Cost containment and quality of care in Japan: is there a trade-off?

Authors:  Hideki Hashimoto; Naoki Ikegami; Kenji Shibuya; Nobuyuki Izumida; Haruko Noguchi; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroaki Miyata; Jose M Acuin; Michael R Reich
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The effect of hospital volume on cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  L M Ellison; B J Trock; N R Poe; A W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Effects of hospital procedure volume and resident training on clinical outcomes and resource use in radical retropubic prostatectomy surgery in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Tse-Sun Ku; Christopher J Kane; Saunak Sen; William G Henderson; R Adams Dudley; Brian A Cason
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Impact of surgeon and hospital volumes on short-term postoperative complications after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Osamu Nishii; Yasuo Hirai; Kazunori Ochiai; Yutaka Matsuyama; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Patient outcomes and length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: analysis of hospital episodes statistics for England.

Authors:  Andrew Judge; Simon Evans; David J Gunnell; Peter C Albertsen; Julia Verne; Richard M Martin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Immediate surgical outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Data Base: the impact of hospital case volume, hospital size and geographical region on 48,000 patients.

Authors:  Robert E Mitchell; Byron T Lee; Michael S Cookson; Daniel A Barocas; S Duke Herrell; Peter E Clark; Joseph A Smith; Sam S Chang
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  1 in total

1.  Access to high-volume surgeons and the opportunity cost of performing radical prostatectomy by low-volume providers.

Authors:  Afsaneh Barzi; Eric A Klein; Siamak Daneshmand; Inderbir Gill; David I Quinn; Sarmad Sadeghi
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.498

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.