Afsaneh Barzi1, Eric A Klein2, Siamak Daneshmand1, Inderbir Gill1, David I Quinn1, Sarmad Sadeghi3. 1. Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 2. Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 3. Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: Sarmad.Sadeghi@usc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that redirecting surgeries to high-volume providers may be associated with better outcomes and significant societal savings. Whether such referrals are feasible remains unanswered. METHODS: Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, SEER 18, and US Incidence data were used to determine the geographic distribution and radical prostatectomy volume for providers. Access was defined as availability of a high-volume provider within driving distance of 100 miles. The opportunity cost was defined as the value of benefits achievable by performing the surgery by a high-volume provider that was forgone by not making a referral. The savings per referral were derived from a published Markov model for radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: A total of 14% of providers performed>27% of the radical prostatectomies with>30 cases per year and were designated high-volume providers. Providers with below-median volume (≤16 prostatectomies per year) performed>32% of radical prostatectomies. At least 47% of these were within a 100-mile driving distance (median = 22 miles), and therefore had access to a high-volume provider (>30 prostatectomies per year). This translated into a discounted savings of more than $24 million per year, representing the opportunity cost of not making a referral. The average volume for high- and low-volume providers was 55 and 13, respectively, resulting in an annual experience gap of 43 and a cumulative gap of 125 surgeries over 3 years. In 2014, the number of surgeons performing radical prostatectomy decreased by 5% while the number of high- and low-volume providers decreased by 25% and 11% showing a faster decline in the number of high-volume providers compared with low-volume surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: About half of prostatectomies performed by surgeons with below-median annual volume were within a 100-mile driving distance (median of 22 miles) of a high-volume surgeon. Such a referral may result in minimal additional costs and substantially improved outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that redirecting surgeries to high-volume providers may be associated with better outcomes and significant societal savings. Whether such referrals are feasible remains unanswered. METHODS: Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, SEER 18, and US Incidence data were used to determine the geographic distribution and radical prostatectomy volume for providers. Access was defined as availability of a high-volume provider within driving distance of 100 miles. The opportunity cost was defined as the value of benefits achievable by performing the surgery by a high-volume provider that was forgone by not making a referral. The savings per referral were derived from a published Markov model for radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: A total of 14% of providers performed>27% of the radical prostatectomies with>30 cases per year and were designated high-volume providers. Providers with below-median volume (≤16 prostatectomies per year) performed>32% of radical prostatectomies. At least 47% of these were within a 100-mile driving distance (median = 22 miles), and therefore had access to a high-volume provider (>30 prostatectomies per year). This translated into a discounted savings of more than $24 million per year, representing the opportunity cost of not making a referral. The average volume for high- and low-volume providers was 55 and 13, respectively, resulting in an annual experience gap of 43 and a cumulative gap of 125 surgeries over 3 years. In 2014, the number of surgeons performing radical prostatectomy decreased by 5% while the number of high- and low-volume providers decreased by 25% and 11% showing a faster decline in the number of high-volume providers compared with low-volume surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: About half of prostatectomies performed by surgeons with below-median annual volume were within a 100-mile driving distance (median of 22 miles) of a high-volume surgeon. Such a referral may result in minimal additional costs and substantially improved outcomes.
Authors: Milton C Weinstein; Bernie O'Brien; John Hornberger; Joseph Jackson; Magnus Johannesson; Chris McCabe; Bryan R Luce Journal: Value Health Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Shabbir M H Alibhai; Marc Leach; George Tomlinson; Murray D Krahn; Neil Fleshner; Eric Holowaty; Gary Naglie Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Shane E Cotter; Ming Hui Chen; Judd W Moul; W Robert Lee; Bridget F Koontz; Mitchell S Anscher; Cary N Robertson; Philip J Walther; Thomas J Polascik; Anthony V D'Amico Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Angel M Serio; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-07-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Anthony J Paravati; Isabel J Boero; Daniel P Triplett; Lindsay Hwang; Rayna K Matsuno; Beibei Xu; Loren K Mell; James D Murphy Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Afsaneh Barzi; Primo N Lara; Denice Tsao-Wei; Dongyun Yang; Inderbir S Gill; Siamak Daneshmand; Eric A Klein; Jacek K Pinski; David F Penson; David I Quinn; Sarmad Sadeghi Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 6.860