Literature DB >> 19681895

Immediate surgical outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Data Base: the impact of hospital case volume, hospital size and geographical region on 48,000 patients.

Robert E Mitchell1, Byron T Lee, Michael S Cookson, Daniel A Barocas, S Duke Herrell, Peter E Clark, Joseph A Smith, Sam S Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of hospital variables on immediate surgical outcomes for patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) in academic centres. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Data Base was queried for data corresponding to patients who had RP at one of 130 academic medical centres nationwide between 2003 and the second quarter of 2007 (48,086). RP case volume (1-99, 100-499 and >500), total discharges (1-49,999, 50,000-99,999 >100,000), and geographical region (five categories) were determined and categorized for each academic centre. Analysis of variance and the Tukey statistic were used to assess the results. Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) rate, complication rate (CR) and in-hospital mortality (IHM) were analysed.
RESULTS: Case volume was a significant predictor of LOS, ICU and CR. The mean LOS was 3.77, 2.65 and 2.09 days, respectively, for centres from three tiers of lowest to highest case volumes (P < 0.001). ICU rates for the three tiers were 18.57, 3.61, and 1.30 (P < 0.001); CRs were 15.93, 8.79 and 5.76 (P < 0.001). Tukey analysis showed a 'ceiling' effect for ICU and CRs; there were no differences between the two higher case-volume groups. IHM was not significantly different between groups stratified by case volume. Stratification by total discharges showed differences in ICU rates only (P = 0.003). Stratification by geographical region showed no differences in outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: RP case volume was an important variable in predicting three of the four outcome variables. CRs and ICU rates showed a 'ceiling effect' suggesting that an unknown 'critical volume' of cases portends improved surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19681895     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08794.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Influence of size and complexity of the hospitals in an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; José Manuel Ramirez; Daniel Callejo; Xavier Viñas; Sergio Maeso; Roger Cabezali; Elena Miranda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Challenging boundaries: an enhanced recovery programme for radical cystectomy.

Authors:  S Mukhtar; B E Ayres; R Issa; M J Swinn; M J A Perry
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Chan; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Renea M Sturm; Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Yu-Ning Wong; Matthew E Nielsen; Brian L Egleston; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Racial variation in the pattern and quality of care for prostate cancer in the USA: mind the gap.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; David F Penson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Influence of hospital surgical volume of radical prostatectomy on quality of perioperative care.

Authors:  Yoshikatsu Nojiri; Kikuo Okamura; Yoshinori Tanaka; Hitoshi Yanaihara; Naoto Sassa; Ryohei Hattori; Jiroh Machida; Katsuyoshi Hashine; Tadashi Matsuda; Yoichi Arai; Seiji Naito; Tomonori Hasegawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.402

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.