Jerome N Rachele1, Steven M McPhail, Tracy L Washington, Thomas F Cuddihy. 1. Queensland University of Technology, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia. jerome.rachele@connect.qut.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The accurate evaluation of physical activity levels amongst youth is critical for quantifying physical activity behaviors and evaluating the effect of physical activity interventions. The purpose of this review is to evaluate contemporary approaches to physical activity evaluation amongst youth. DATA SOURCES: The literature from a range of sources was reviewed and synthesized to provide an overview of contemporary approaches for measuring youth physical activity. RESULTS: Five broad categories are described: self-report, instrumental movement detection, biological approaches, direct observation, and combined methods. Emerging technologies and priorities for future research are also identified. CONCLUSIONS: There will always be a trade-off between accuracy and available resources when choosing the best approach for measuring physical activity amongst youth. Unfortunately, cost and logistical challenges may prohibit the use of "gold standard" physical activity measurement approaches such as doubly labelled water. Other objective methods such as heart rate monitoring, accelerometry, pedometry, indirect calorimetry, or a combination of measures have the potential to better capture the duration and intensity of physical activity, while self-reported measures are useful for capturing the type and context of activity.
BACKGROUND: The accurate evaluation of physical activity levels amongst youth is critical for quantifying physical activity behaviors and evaluating the effect of physical activity interventions. The purpose of this review is to evaluate contemporary approaches to physical activity evaluation amongst youth. DATA SOURCES: The literature from a range of sources was reviewed and synthesized to provide an overview of contemporary approaches for measuring youth physical activity. RESULTS: Five broad categories are described: self-report, instrumental movement detection, biological approaches, direct observation, and combined methods. Emerging technologies and priorities for future research are also identified. CONCLUSIONS: There will always be a trade-off between accuracy and available resources when choosing the best approach for measuring physical activity amongst youth. Unfortunately, cost and logistical challenges may prohibit the use of "gold standard" physical activity measurement approaches such as doubly labelled water. Other objective methods such as heart rate monitoring, accelerometry, pedometry, indirect calorimetry, or a combination of measures have the potential to better capture the duration and intensity of physical activity, while self-reported measures are useful for capturing the type and context of activity.
Authors: M Hagströmer; P Bergman; I De Bourdeaudhuij; F B Ortega; J R Ruiz; Y Manios; J P Rey-López; K Phillipp; J von Berlepsch; M Sjöström Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Robert G McMurray; Dianne S Ward; John P Elder; Leslie A Lytle; Patricia K Strikmiller; Christopher D Baggett; Deborah R Young Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2008 Sep-Oct
Authors: Louisa G Sylvia; Emily E Bernstein; Jane L Hubbard; Leigh Keating; Ellen J Anderson Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Jerome N Rachele; Timo Jaakkola; Tracy L Washington; Thomas F Cuddihy; Steven M McPhail Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Justin B Moore; Michael W Beets; Keith Brazendale; Steven N Blair; Russell R Pate; Lars B Andersen; Sigmund A Anderssen; Anders Grøntved; Pedro C Hallal; Katarzyna Kordas; Susi Kriemler; John J Reilly; Luis B Sardinha Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Éva Bácsné Bába; Gergely Ráthonyi; Anetta Müller; Kinga Ráthonyi-Odor; Péter Balogh; Róza Ádány; Zoltán Bács Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2020-06-02
Authors: Sigurd K Beldo; Nils Abel Aars; Tore Christoffersen; Anne-Sofie Furberg; Peder A Halvorsen; Bjørge Herman Hansen; Alexander Horsch; Edvard H Sagelv; Shaheen Syed; Bente Morseth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.752