Literature DB >> 26336344

Adolescent Self-Reported Physical Activity and Autonomy: A Case for Constrained and Structured Environments?

Jerome N Rachele1, Timo Jaakkola1, Tracy L Washington1, Thomas F Cuddihy1, Steven M McPhail1.   

Abstract

The provision of autonomy supportive environments that promote physical activity engagement have become popular in contemporary youth settings. However, questions remain about whether adolescent perceptions of their autonomy have implications for physical activity. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the association between adolescents' self-reported physical activity and their perceived autonomy. Participants (n = 384 adolescents) aged between 12 and 15 years were recruited from six secondary schools in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia. Self-reported measures of physical activity and autonomy were obtained. Logistic regression with inverse probability weights were used to examine the association between autonomy and the odds of meeting youth physical activity guidelines. Autonomy (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.76) and gender (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83) were negatively associated with meeting physical activity guidelines. However, the model explained only a small amount of the variation in whether youth in this sample met physical activity guidelines (R(2) = 0.023). For every 1 unit decrease in autonomy (on an index from 1 to 5), participants were 1.64 times more likely to meet physical activity guidelines. The findings, which are at odds with several previous studies, suggest that interventions designed to facilitate youth physical activity should limit opportunities for youth to make independent decisions about their engagement. However, the small amount of variation explained by the predictors in the model is a caveat, and should be considered prior to applying such suggestions in practical settings. Future research should continue to examine a larger age range, longitudinal observational or intervention studies to examine assertions of causality, as well as objective measurement of physical activity. Key pointsAutonomy was negatively associated with meeting physical activity recommendationsThe findings suggest that more structured environments would facilitate physical activityThe small amount of variation explained by the predictors in the model is a caveat.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; autonomy; physical activity; self-determination theory; self-report

Year:  2015        PMID: 26336344      PMCID: PMC4541121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  26 in total

1.  Autonomy: what is it? Introduction.

Authors:  Margaret A Boden
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  Long-term effectiveness of interventions promoting physical activity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Thomas Reinhold; Marc Nocon; Stefan N Willich
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Concurrent validity of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-A) in European adolescents: The HELENA Study.

Authors:  M Hagströmer; P Bergman; I De Bourdeaudhuij; F B Ortega; J R Ruiz; Y Manios; J P Rey-López; K Phillipp; J von Berlepsch; M Sjöström
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Diet quality, nutrition and physical activity among adolescents: the Web-SPAN (Web-Survey of Physical Activity and Nutrition) project.

Authors:  Kate E Storey; Laura E Forbes; Shawn N Fraser; John C Spence; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Kim D Raine; Rhona M Hanning; Linda J McCargar
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 5.  The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Catherine N Rasberry; Sarah M Lee; Leah Robin; B A Laris; Lisa A Russell; Karin K Coyle; Allison J Nihiser
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 6.  Can exercise improve self esteem in children and young people? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  E Ekeland; F Heian; K B Hagen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Physical activity and depressive symptoms in adolescents: a prospective study.

Authors:  Catherine Rothon; Phil Edwards; Kamaldeep Bhui; Russell M Viner; Stephanie Taylor; Stephen A Stansfeld
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Socioeconomic effects on meeting physical activity guidelines: comparisons among 32 countries.

Authors:  Alberto Borraccino; Patrizia Lemma; Ronald J Iannotti; Alessio Zambon; Paola Dalmasso; Giacomo Lazzeri; Mariano Giacchi; Franco Cavallo
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Physical activity awareness of British adolescents.

Authors:  Kirsten Corder; Esther M F van Sluijs; Ian Goodyer; Charlotte L Ridgway; Rebekah M Steele; Diane Bamber; Valerie Dunn; Simon J Griffin; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-07

Review 10.  Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro J Teixeira; Eliana V Carraça; David Markland; Marlene N Silva; Richard M Ryan
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.