Literature DB >> 22885895

Effect of water deficit on leaf phenolic composition, gas exchange, oxidative damage and antioxidant activity of four Greek olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars.

Antonios Petridis1, Ioannis Therios, Georgios Samouris, Stefanos Koundouras, Anastasia Giannakoula.   

Abstract

The olive tree (Olea europaea L.) is often exposed to severe water stress during the summer season. In this study, we determined the changes in total phenol content, oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol in the leaves of four olive cultivars ('Gaidourelia', 'Kalamon', 'Koroneiki' and 'Megaritiki') grown under water deficit conditions for two months. Furthermore, we investigated the photosynthetic performance in terms of gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence, as well as malondialdehyde content and antioxidant activity. One-year-old self-rooted plants were subjected to three irrigation treatments that received a water amount equivalent to 100% (Control, C), 66% (Field Capacity 66%, FC(66)) and 33% (Field Capacity 33%, FC(33)) of field capacity. Measurements were conducted 30 and 60 days after the initiation of the experiment. Net CO(2) assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and F(v)/F(m) ratio decreased only in FC(33) plants. Photosynthetic rate was reduced mainly due to stomatal closure, but damage to PSII also contributed to this decrease. Water stress induced the accumulation of phenolic compounds, especially oleuropein, suggesting their role as antioxidants. Total phenol content increased in FC(33) treatment and oleuropein presented a slight increase in FC(66) and a sharper one in FC(33) treatment. Hydroxytyrosol showed a gradual decrease as water stress progressed. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content increased due to water stress, mostly after 60 days, while antioxidant activity increased for all cultivars in the FC(33) treatment. 'Gaidourelia' could be considered as the most tolerant among the tested cultivars, showing higher phenolic concentration and antioxidant activity and lower lipid peroxidation and photochemical damage after two months of water stress. The results indicated that water stress affected olive tree physiological and biochemical parameters and magnitude of this effect depended on genotype, the degree of water limitation and duration of treatment. However, the severity as well as the duration of water stress might exceed antioxidant capacity, since MDA levels and subsequent oxidative damage increased after two months of water deficit.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22885895     DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0981-9428            Impact factor:   4.270


  19 in total

1.  Exogenous application of β-sitosterol mediated growth and yield improvement in water-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum) involves up-regulated antioxidant system.

Authors:  Amr Elkeilsh; Yasser M Awad; Mona H Soliman; Abdelghafar Abu-Elsaoud; Magdi T Abdelhamid; Ibrahim M El-Metwally
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Peach leaf responses to soil and cement dust pollution.

Authors:  Persefoni A Maletsika; George D Nanos; George G Stavroulakis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Whole plant response of Pongamia pinnata to drought stress tolerance revealed by morpho-physiological, biochemical and transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  K Rajarajan; S Sakshi; S Taria; P T Prathima; A Radhakrishna; H Anuragi; M Ashajyothi; A Bharati; A K Handa; A Arunachalam
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Foliar Application of Nano-Silicon Improves the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of 'Kalamata' Olive Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in a Semi-Arid Climate.

Authors:  Islam F Hassan; Rahaf Ajaj; Maybelle S Gaballah; Chukwuma C Ogbaga; Hazem M Kalaji; Harlene M Hatterman-Valenti; Shamel M Alam-Eldein
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  Difference in yield and physiological features in response to drought and salinity combined stress during anthesis in Tibetan wild and cultivated barleys.

Authors:  Imrul Mosaddek Ahmed; Fangbin Cao; Mian Zhang; Xianhong Chen; Guoping Zhang; Feibo Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Nutritional, antioxidative, and antimicrobial analysis of the Mediterranean hackberry (Celtis australis L.).

Authors:  Ajda Ota; Ana Miklavčič Višnjevec; Rajko Vidrih; Željko Prgomet; Marijan Nečemer; Janez Hribar; Nina Gunde Cimerman; Sonja Smole Možina; Milena Bučar-Miklavčič; Nataša Poklar Ulrih
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Chloroplast proteome response to drought stress and recovery in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).

Authors:  Rachele Tamburino; Monica Vitale; Alessandra Ruggiero; Mauro Sassi; Lorenza Sannino; Simona Arena; Antonello Costa; Giorgia Batelli; Nicola Zambrano; Andrea Scaloni; Stefania Grillo; Nunzia Scotti
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Physiological and proteomic analyses of the drought stress response in Amygdalus Mira (Koehne) Yü et Lu roots.

Authors:  Yuan Cao; Qiuxiang Luo; Yan Tian; Fanjuan Meng
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Transcriptional regulation-mediating ROS homeostasis and physio-biochemical changes in wild tomato (Solanum chilense) and cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under high salinity.

Authors:  S P Kashyap; Nishi Kumari; Pallavi Mishra; Durga Prasad Moharana; Mohd Aamir; B Singh; H C Prasanna
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  A metabolomic study of Gomphrena agrestis in Brazilian Cerrado suggests drought-adaptive strategies on metabolism.

Authors:  Geraldo Aclécio Melo; Ilka Nacif Abreu; Maíra Baista de Oliveira; Ilara Gabriela Frasson Budzinski; Lucinélia Vieira Silva; Marcio Antônio Silva Pimenta; Thomas Moritz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.