| Literature DB >> 35736712 |
Islam F Hassan1, Rahaf Ajaj2, Maybelle S Gaballah1, Chukwuma C Ogbaga3, Hazem M Kalaji4,5, Harlene M Hatterman-Valenti6, Shamel M Alam-Eldein7.
Abstract
In Egypt's arid and semi-arid lands where the main olive production zone is located, evapotranspiration is higher than rainfall during winter. Limited research has used nanomaterials, especially nano-silicon (nSi) to improve the growth, development, and productivity of drought-stressed fruit trees, amid the global water scarcity problem. To assess the role of nSi on drought-sensitive 'Kalamata' olive tree growth, and biochemical and physiological changes under drought conditions, a split-plot experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design. The trees were foliar sprayed with nSi in the field using nine treatments (three replicates each) of 0, 150, and 200 mg·L-1 under different irrigation regimes (100, 90, and 80% irrigation water requirements 'IWR') during the 2020 and 2021 seasons. Drought negatively affected the trees, but both concentrations of nSi alleviated drought effects at reduced irrigation levels, compared to the non-stressed trees. Foliar spray of both concentrations of nSi at a moderate level (90% IWR) of drought resulted in improved yield and fruit weight and reduced fruit drop percentage, compared to 80% IWR. In addition, there were reduced levels of osmoprotectants such as proline, soluble sugars, and abscisic acid (ABA) with less membrane damage expressed as reduced levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), H2O2 and electrolyte leakage at 90% compared to 80% IWR. These results suggest that 'Kalamata' olive trees were severely stressed at 80% compared to 90% IWR, which was not surprising as it is classified as drought sensitive. Overall, the application of 200 mg·L-1 nSi was beneficial for the improvement of the mechanical resistance, growth, and productivity of moderately-stressed (90% IWR) 'Kalamata' olive trees under the Egyptian semi-arid conditions.Entities:
Keywords: abscisic acid; antioxidants; chloroplast degeneration; drought; malondialdehyde; nanoparticles; oxidative stress; photosynthesis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35736712 PMCID: PMC9229156 DOI: 10.3390/plants11121561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Effect of foliar sprayed nano-silicon (nSi) under different irrigation regimes on the yield (a), fruit weight (b) and fruit drop (c) of ‘Kalamata’ olive trees during the 2020 and 2021 seasons (n = 10). Means with similar letters for each season are not significantly different, using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p ≤ 0.05. Error bars represent the standard error of the means.
Figure 2Effect of foliar sprayed nano-silicon (nSi) under different irrigation regimes on the leaf total chlorophyll (a), proline (b), and soluble sugars (c) of ‘Kalamata’ olive trees during the 2020 and 2021 seasons (n = 10). Means with similar letters for each season are not significantly different, using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p ≤ 0.05. Error bars represent the standard error of the means.
Figure 3Effect of foliar sprayed nano-silicon (nSi) under different irrigation regimes on the leaf relative water content ‘RWC’ (a) and electrolyte leakage (b) of ‘Kalamata’ olive trees during the 2020 and 2021 seasons (n = 10). Means with similar letters for each season are not significantly different, using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p ≤ 0.05. Error bars represent the standard error of the means.
Figure 4Effect of foliar sprayed nano-silicon (nSi) under different irrigation regimes on the leaf malondialdehyde ‘MDA’ (a), H2O2 (b), and abscisic acid ‘ABA’ (c) contents of ‘Kalamata’ olive trees during the 2020 and 2021 seasons (n = 10). Means with similar letters for each season are not significantly different, using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p ≤ 0.05. Error bars represent the standard error of the means.
Soil and water analysis of the experimental site.
| Soil (0–40 cm) | Water | |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 8.22 | 7.01 |
| Sand (%) | 92.0 | – |
| Silt (%) | 5.0 | – |
| Clay (%) | 3.0 | – |
| EC (dS/m) | 1.82 | 1.56 |
| CaCO3 (%) | 3.4 | – |
| Ca2+ (meq·100 g−1) | 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Mg2+ (meq·100 g−1) | 3.2 | 4.3 |
| Na+ (meq·100 g−1) | 6.9 | 9.80 |
| K+ (meq·100 g−1) | 1.5 | 0.22 |
| Cl− (meq·100 g−1) | 8.2 | 6.46 |
| SO42– (meq·100 g−1) | 6.4 | 14.3 |
| CO3– (meq·100 g−1) | 0.0 | – |
| HCO3– (meq·100 g−1) | 5.6 | 3.0 |
Average meteorological data of Wadi El Natrun area (2020 and 2021), source: own elaboration.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp. mean Max (°C) | 20.7 | 25.5 | 25.7 | 27.1 | 32.9 | 33.8 | 34.8 | 34.9 | 32.8 | 28 | 23.2 | 20.7 |
| Temp. mean Min (°C) | 9.1 | 8.98 | 11.1 | 13.7 | 16.7 | 19.5 | 20.2 | 22.7 | 20.2 | 17 | 10 | 9.3 |
| Temp. average (°C) | 14.9 | 17.24 | 19.4 | 20.4 | 24.3 | 26.65 | 27.45 | 28.5 | 26.4 | 23.4 | 20.05 | 15 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 65.1 | 62.5 | 62.56 | 58 | 58.1 | 59.2 | 58.8 | 59.9 | 63.1 | 62 | 65.1 | 65.2 |
| Evaporation (mm·day−1) | 6.2 | 7.7 | 9.8 | 12.5 | 13.8 | 15 | 14.3 | 12.7 | 10.5 | 8.6 | 6.1 | 5.1 |
| 2.80 | 3.30 | 4.0 | 4.80 | 5.30 | 5.80 | 6.10 | 5.40 | 4.40 | 3.10 | 3.02 | 2.90 |