| Literature DB >> 32714024 |
S P Kashyap1,2, Nishi Kumari2, Pallavi Mishra1, Durga Prasad Moharana1,3, Mohd Aamir4, B Singh1, H C Prasanna1,5.
Abstract
Salinity intrusion is one of the biggest problems in the context of sustainable agricultural practices. The major concern and challenge in developing salt-resistance in cultivated crops is the genetic complexity of the trait and lack of natural variability for stress-responsive traits. In this context, tomato wild relatives are important and have provided novel alleles for breeding abiotic stress tolerance including salt tolerance. We provide here a case study, involving tomato wild relative Solanum chilense and cultivated variety Solanum lycopersicum, carried out under high salt stress to investigate comparative transcriptional regulation mediating ROS homeostasis and other physiological attributes. Salt dependent oxidative stress in S. lycopersicum was characterized by a relatively higher H2O2 content, generation of O2 •-, electrolytic leakage and lipid peroxidation whereas reduced content of both ascorbate and glutathione. On the contrary, the robust anti-oxidative system in the S. chilense particularly counteracted the salt-induced oxidative damages by a higher fold change in expression profile of defense-related salt-responsive genes along with the increased activities of anti-oxidative enzymes. We conclude that S. chilense harbours novel genes or alleles for salt stress-related traits that could be identified, characterized, and mapped for its possible introgression into cultivated tomato lines.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; Salt stress; Solanum chilense; Tomato; Wild halophytes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714024 PMCID: PMC7376111 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Effects of 0, 7, 14, and 21 d of salt stress conditions on Fv/Fm, relative water content (RWC), electrolyte leakage (EL), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2•−) in Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum chilense.
| Treatments | Physiological parameter and free radical generation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fv/Fm | RWC | EL | H2O2 | O2•− | ||||||
| DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | |
| 0 d | 0.65 ± 0.03bcd | 0.93 ± 0.02a | 81.3 ± 3.3ab | 89.1 ± 5.6a | 21.4 ± 1.5e | 17.8 ± 1.7e | 27.1 ± 4.8bc | 25.5 ± 2.00c | 0.48 ± 0.14cd | 0.25 ± 0.01d |
| 7 d | 0.53 ± 0.03cde | 0.81 ± 0.02ab | 61.5 ± 3.8cd | 78.9 ± 1.6ab | 39.6 ± 3.8c | 24.0 ± 3.1de | 34.8 ± 1.6bc | 28.5 ± 1.2bc | 0.82 ± 0.08c | 0.27 ± 0.01d |
| 14 d | 0.46 ± 0.07de | 0.72 ± 0.03bc | 48.8 ± 3.7de | 67.6 ± 3.6bc | 51.2 ± 2.0b | 33.8 ± 3.9cd | 53.7 ± 3.9a | 32.4 ± 2.5bc | 1.43 ± 0.24b | 0.35 ± 0.02cd |
| 21 d | 0.41 ± 0.10e | 0.72 ± 0.01bc | 36.0 ± 3.9e | 61.9 ± 5.0cd | 74.8 ± 3.1a | 41.4 ± 1.8bc | 64.1 ± 1.7a | 38.7 ± 4.3b | 2.28 ± 0.18a | 0.76 ± 0.13cd |
Mean (+SE) was calculated from three replicates for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 applying the DMRT test.
Effects of 0, 7, 14, and 21 d of salt stress conditions on proline, lipid peroxidation (LPO), chlorophyll colour index (CCI), total chlorophyll (Total Chl) and carotenoids in Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum chilense.
| Treatments | Metabolites and pigment content | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proline (µ g−1 FW) | LPO (mm g−1 FW) | CCI | Total Chl (mg g-1FW) | Carotenoids (mg g−1 FW) | ||||||
| DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | DVRT-1 | Chilense | |
| 0 d | 11.5 ± 1.28 d | 13.8 ± 1.6d | 1.28 ± 0.03e | 1.09 ± 0.19e | 47.6 ± 2.4ab | 50.6 ± 1.0a | 3.1 ± 0.15b | 3.8 ± 0.31a | 0.55 ± 0.04a | 0.59 ± 0.02a |
| 7 d | 56.8 ± 1.45c | 104.1 ± 2.0b | 2.39 ± 0.25cd | 1.44 ± 0.23de | 42.0 ± 2.4bc | 46.6 ± 1.5abc | 2.0 ± 0.07cd | 3.3 ± 0.01ab | 0.40 ± 0.01c | 0.55 ± 0.03a |
| 14 d | 112.2 ± 1.50b | 215.9 ± 5.9a | 3.91 ± 0.43b | 2.06 ± 0.21cde | 32.6 ± 1.9d | 39.0 ± 2.9cd | 1.7 ± 0.05d | 3.2 ± 0.15ab | 0.42 ± 0.02bc | 0.53 ± 0.02ab |
| 21 d | 98.8 ± 2.26b | 208.2 ± 6.8a | 6.72 ± 0.36a | 2.58 ± 0.13c | 20.6 ± 1.7e | 31.3 ± 1.6d | 0.82 ± 0.08e | 2.3 ± 0.11c | 0.24 ± 0.008d | 0.49 ± 0.04abc |
Mean (+SE) was calculated from three replicates for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 applying the DMRT test.
Fig. 1Activities of key antioxidant enzymes in Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum chilense at 0, 7, 14, and 21 d of salt stress conditions. (A) ascorbate peroxidase activity, (B) catalase activity, (C) superoxide dismutase activity, (D) glutathione reductase activity, (E) dehydroascorbate reductase activity, (F) monodehydroascorbate reductase activity, and (G) guaiacol peroxidase activity. The data are mean of three replicates ± SE. * Bars with distinct letters are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 applying the DMRT test.
Fig. 2Estimation of (A) total ascorbate (AsA), (B) reduced ascorbate (RAsA), (C) dehydroascorbate (DHA), (D) total glutathione (Glut), (E) reduced glutathione (GSH), and (F) oxidized glutathione (GSSG) in Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum chilense at 0, 7, 14, and 21 d of salt stress conditions. The data are mean of three replicates ± SE. * Bars with distinct letters are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 applying the DMRT test.