Literature DB >> 22885803

In vivo comparisons of patellofemoral kinematics before and after ADVANCE Medial-Pivot total knee arthroplasty.

Kazunari Ishida1, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Nobuhiro Tsumura, Nobuaki Chinzei, Atsushi Kitagawa, Seiji Kubo, Takaaki Chin, Tetsuhiro Iguchi, Toshihiro Akisue, Kotaro Nishida, Masahiro Kurosaka, Ryosuke Kuroda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: ADVANCE Medial-Pivot (MP) (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to replicate normal tibiofemoral knee joint kinematics, allowing medial-pivot knee motion. The design concept of the prosthesis is unique; therefore, the influence on the patellofemoral knee joint remains unclear at present. The purpose of this study was to determine the in vivo patellofemoral kinematics with ADVANCE MP TKA and compare them with the pre-operative conditions.
METHODS: ADVANCE MP TKA was performed in ten subjects with osteoarthritis (OA). At before and one month after surgery, lateral radiographs with weight-bearing at maximum extension, 30, 60 and 90° were taken, and patella flexion angle (PF), tibiopatellar angle (TP) and estimated patellofemoral contact point (PC) were evaluated, according to a previously reported method.
RESULTS: In PF and TP, there was no statistically significant change between pre-operative and postoperative values. Pre-operative PC reached its peak at 90°; however, its peak was at 60° at one month after surgery. Postoperative PC at maximum extension was significantly higher compared to before surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The results in this study indicated that ADVANCE MP TKA changed patellofemoral joint kinematics compared to before surgery. Early postoperative evaluation is the limitation of this study; however, we consider that the results in this study might be one of the keys to resolving the kinematic features of this prosthesis, helping clinicians to comprehend this prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22885803      PMCID: PMC3460083          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1634-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  An in vivo determination of patellofemoral contact positions.

Authors:  R D Komistek; D A Dennis; J A Mabe; S A Walker
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The influence of femoral rollback on patellofemoral contact loads in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D L Churchill; S J Incavo; C C Johnson; B D Beynnon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Patellofemoral complications after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2 different implant designs.

Authors:  Michael J Anderson; David L Becker; Travis Kieckbusch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Extensor mechanism problems following total knee replacement.

Authors:  David F Dalury; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Influence of lateral release on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Hsu; Z P Luo; J A Rand; K N An
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; C Poole; H Chadha; J C Hermida; A Mahar; C W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M C Miller; R A Berger; A J Petrella; A Karmas; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Analysis of the kinematics of total knee prostheses with a medial pivot design.

Authors:  Yoshiyasu Miyazaki; Takashi Nakamura; Katsunori Kogame; Muneki Saito; Keitaro Yamamoto; Toru Suguro
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty. Effect on contact area and contact stress.

Authors:  S Matsuda; T Ishinishi; S E White; L A Whiteside
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Pathomechanics of the femoropatellar joint following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G O Hofmann; F W Hagena
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Analysis of in-vivo articular cartilage contact surface of the knee during a step-up motion.

Authors:  Peng Yin; Jing-Sheng Li; Willem A Kernkamp; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Seung-Hoon Baek; Ali Hosseini; Lin Lin; Peifu Tang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Kinematically aligned TKA restores physiological patellofemoral biomechanics in the sagittal plane during a deep knee bend.

Authors:  Stephanie Nicolet-Petersen; Augustine Saiz; Trevor Shelton; Stephen Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Mid-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty-a mean five year follow-up based on one thousand, one hundred and twenty eight cases.

Authors:  Shuai Xiang; Yingzhen Wang; Chengyu Lv; Changyao Wang; Haining Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Tibiofemoral rotational alignment affects flexion angles in navigated posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Nao Shibanuma; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Akihiko Toda; Shinya Oka; Kazuki Kodato; Koji Takayama; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Does the medial pivot knee improve the clinical and radiographic outcome of total knee arthroplasty? A single centre study on two hundred and ninety seven patients.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciola; Ivan De Martino; Federico De Meo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparison of clinical and radiographic results between total knee arthroplasties using medial pivot and posterior-stabilized prosthesis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuedong Sun; Xiaopeng Gao; Xiaohui Sun; Zheng Su
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Comparison of Biomechanical Gait Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcome in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Use of Fixed-Bearing Medial Pivot and Multi-radius Design Implants-Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study.

Authors:  Artur Stolarczyk; Bartosz M Maciąg; Marcin Mostowy; Grzegorz J Maciąg; Piotr Stępiński; Jakub Szymczak; Krystian Żarnovsky; Maciej Świercz; Łukasz Oleksy; Magda Stolarczyk
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-01-24

8.  Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Medial Pivot Prostheses and Posterior-Stabilized Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Lin; Xueyan Chen; Li Li; Zhenxing Li; Yu Zhang; Pei Fan
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 2.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.