Literature DB >> 22885272

To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers.

Thomas R Einarson1, Gideon Koren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scientists and clinicians are often called upon to review papers and may need guidance to optimize their performance as reviewers.
PURPOSE: To provide guidance and insight into the peer review process and elaborate on issues relevant to journals dealing with therapeutics.
METHODS: Issues and recommendations appearing in the literature have been identified and summarized for potential reviewers and readers of the journal.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the literature can be improved through the participation of peer reviewers. Guidance has been provided and some resources listed to assist.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22885272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 2561-8741


  4 in total

Review 1.  A guide to peer reviewing for Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Marcel P Dijkers
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Andrew S Bzowyckyj; Andrew P Traynor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Reviews, reviewers and reviewing.

Authors:  Ancuţa Zazgyva; Elizaveta Kon; Cyril Mauffrey; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Insurance Companies Fighting the Peer Review Empire without any Validity: the Case for Addiction and Pain Modalities in the face of an American Drug Epidemic.

Authors:  K Blum; W Jacobs; E J Modestino; N DiNubile; D Baron; T McLaughlin; D Siwicki; I Elman; M Moran; E R Braverman; P K Thanos; R D Badgaiyan
Journal:  SEJ Surg Pain       Date:  2018-10-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.