Literature DB >> 33828248

A guide to peer reviewing for Spinal Cord.

Marcel P Dijkers1.   

Abstract

Peer reviewing is a key mechanism underlying science publishing, but during their graduate training clinicians and researchers are unlikely to be taught the skill. This paper sets forth the art of peer reviewing in general, and the types of reviews that are most useful to the Editors of Spinal Cord (SC). The topics addressed are: the SC editorial process; the role of the referee; review process steps; the content and language of a review; and resources available to peer reviewers.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828248     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00627-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  3 in total

1.  A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

Authors:  James M Provenzale; Robert J Stanley
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2006-06

2.  A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.

Authors:  Joseph M Garfield; Alan David Kaye; Daniel C Kolinsky; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Pract Manage       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

3.  To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers.

Authors:  Thomas R Einarson; Gideon Koren
Journal:  J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-08-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.