Literature DB >> 22883549

Reoperations on the pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft after the Ross procedure: An update on the German Dutch Ross Registry.

Efstratios I Charitos1, Johanna J M Takkenberg, Thorsten Hanke, Armin Gorski, Cornelius Botha, Ulrich Franke, Ali Dodge-Khatami, Juergen Hoerer, Rudiger Lange, Anton Moritz, Katharina Ferrari-Kuehne, Roland Hetzer, Michael Huebler, Ad J J C Bogers, Ulrich Stierle, Hans-Hinrich Sievers, Wolfgang Hemmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reinterventions after the Ross procedure are a concern for patients and treating physicians. The scope of the present report was to provide an update on the reinterventions observed in the large patient population of the German-Dutch Ross Registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 2011, 2023 patients (age, 39.05 ± 16.5 years; male patients, 1502; adults, 1642) underwent a Ross procedure in 13 centers. The mean follow-up was 7.1 ± 4.6 years (range, 0-22 years; 13,168 patient-years).
RESULTS: In the adult population, 120 autograft reinterventions in 113 patients (1.03%/patient-year) and 76 homograft reinterventions in 67 patients (0.65%/patient-year) and, in the pediatric population, 14 autograft reinterventions in 13 patients (0.91%/patient-year) and 42 homograft reinterventions in 31 patients (2.72%/patient-year) were observed. Of the autograft and homograft reinterventions, 17.9% and 21.2% were performed because of endocarditis, respectively. The subcoronary technique in the adult population resulted in significantly superior autograft durability (freedom from autograft reintervention: 97% at 10 years and 91% at 12 years; P < .001). The root replacement technique without root reinforcement (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.1) and the presence of pure aortic insufficiency preoperatively (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.5) were statistically significant predictors for a shorter time to reoperation. The center volume had a significant influence on the long-term results. The freedom from homograft reoperation for the adults and pediatric population was 97% and 87% at 5 years and 93% and 79% at 12 years, respectively (P < .001), with younger recipient and donor age being significant predictors of a shorter time to homograft reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: The autograft principle remains a valid option for young patients requiring aortic valve replacement. The risk of reoperation depends largely on the surgical technique used and the preoperative hemodynamics. Center experience and expertise also influence the long-term results. Adequate endocarditis prophylaxis might further reduce the need for reoperation.
Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22883549     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current spectrum, challenges and new developments in the surgical care of adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jürgen Hörer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

2.  Pulmonary autograft in aortic position: is everything known?

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Antonio Nenna; Cristiano Spadaccio; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-01

3.  The choice of heart valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in the young: about choices and consequences.

Authors:  Thierry Bove
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

Review 4.  Narrative review of the contemporary surgical treatment of unicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Maria von Stumm; Tatjana Sequeira-Gross; Johannes Petersen; Shiho Naito; Lisa Müller; Christoph Sinning; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

5.  Ex vivo biomechanical analysis of the Ross procedure using the modified inclusion technique in a 3-dimensionally printed left heart simulator.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Matthew H Park; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Robert J Wilkerson; Sarah Madira; Danielle M Mullis; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  The reinforced full-root technique for the Ross operation: surgical considerations and operative insights.

Authors:  Markus Liebrich; Efstratios I Charitos; Christoph Dingemann; Detlef Roser; Joerg Seeburger; Wolfgang Hemmer; Vladimir Voth
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

7.  Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure in adults.

Authors:  William H Ryan; John J Squiers; Katherine B Harrington; Tammy Goodenow; Courtney Rawitscher; Justin M Schaffer; J Michael DiMaio; William T Brinkman
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

8.  The Ross procedure in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Morgan K Moroi; Emile A Bacha; David M Kalfa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

Review 9.  Aortopathy associated with congenital heart disease: A current literature review.

Authors:  Katrien Francois
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

10.  Ross procedure in children: 17-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Sharman P Tan Tanny; Matthew S Yong; Yves d'Udekem; Remi Kowalski; Gavin Wheaton; Luigi D'Orsogna; John C Galati; Christian P Brizard; Igor E Konstantinov
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.