Literature DB >> 22882883

Chapter 10: A macro-model of smoking and lung cancer: examining aggregate trends in lung cancer rates using the CPS-I and CPS-II and two-stage clonal expansion models.

David T Levy1, Kenneth Blackman, Eduard Zaloshnja.   

Abstract

Past studies have examined the relationship of lung cancer to smoking using longitudinal data for select samples. This study applies the two-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model to U.S. +xsmoking data over a 25-year period. Smoking Base Case (SBC) data on actual smoking duration and intensity from the years 1975-2000 are applied by gender to separate TSCE models, which are then calibrated to historical trends in lung cancer death rates using regression analysis. The uncalibrated and calibrated TSCE models are also applied to SBC data for two scenarios: (1) no tobacco control and (2) complete tobacco control. The results are used to develop estimates of the number of lives saved as a result of tobacco control and how many lives would be saved if cigarette use had ceased in 1965. Predictions of lung cancer from the TSCE models with CPS-II and the CPS-I data for males and especially females are considerably below historical rates with the deviations from historical rates increasing over time. Residual trends unrelated to the smoking models were also found. Tobacco control activities saved approximately 625,000 lives between the years 1975 and 2000. An additional 2,110,000 lives would have been saved if all smoking was stopped in 1965. Tobacco control has successfully prevented lung cancer deaths, but many more lives could be saved with further reductions in smoking rates. Systematic biases were observed from TSCE models using CPS-I and CPS-II data to estimate smoking-related lung cancer deaths.
© 2012 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22882883      PMCID: PMC3431288          DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01795.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  20 in total

Review 1.  Differences between studies in reported relative risks associated with smoking: an overview.

Authors:  P J van de Mheen; L J Gunning-Schepers
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Annoyance from environmental tobacco smoke and support for no-smoking policies at eight large Dutch workplaces.

Authors:  M C Willemsen; H de Vries; R Genders
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Changes in mortality from smoking in two American Cancer Society prospective studies since 1959.

Authors:  M J Thun; C W Heath
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Presenting manifestations, cigarette smoking, and detection bias in age at diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  C K Wells; P N Peduzzi; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years' observations on male British doctors.

Authors:  R Doll; R Peto; K Wheatley; R Gray; I Sutherland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-08

6.  Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the American Cancer Society prospective studies.

Authors:  L Garfinkel
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1985-05

7.  Lung cancer mortality in relation to age, duration of smoking, and daily cigarette consumption: results from Cancer Prevention Study II.

Authors:  W Dana Flanders; Cathy A Lally; Bao-Ping Zhu; S Jane Henley; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Detection bias in the diagnostic pursuit of lung cancer.

Authors:  C K Wells; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Reported prevalences of former smokers in survey data: the importance of differential mortality and misclassification.

Authors:  P J van de Mheen; L J Gunning-Schepers
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Smoking habits and tar levels in a new American Cancer Society prospective study of 1.2 million men and women.

Authors:  S D Stellman; L Garfinkel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  4 in total

1.  Chapter 6: Lung cancer in never smokers: epidemiology and risk prediction models.

Authors:  William J McCarthy; Rafael Meza; Jihyoun Jeon; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Chapter 8: The FHCRC lung cancer model.

Authors:  William D Hazelton; Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Chapter 13: CISNET lung models: comparison of model assumptions and model structures.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; William D Hazelton; Marek Kimmel; Lauren D Clarke
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Predicting the Epidemiological Dynamics of Lung Cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Nishiura
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.