Literature DB >> 8017403

Reported prevalences of former smokers in survey data: the importance of differential mortality and misclassification.

P J van de Mheen1, L J Gunning-Schepers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reported increase in the percentage of never smokers in the group of men born between 1924 and 1938, as observed in survey data in the Netherlands, can be attributed to differential mortality or to misclassification. In a spreadsheet program, the mortality experiences of the men born in 1924 and 1938 were simulated with the use of lifetable techniques. Due to differential mortality, the percentage of true never smokers would be expected to increase from 9% to 9.3% for men born in 1938 and from 9% to 10.3% for men born in 1924. In the survey, the percentage of people who reported that they had never smoked increased from 9% to 36% for the men born between 1924 and 1938. Differential mortality can only explain a very small part of the reported increase in the percentage of "never" smokers. Misclassification of former smokers as never smokers is the most likely cause for the reported increase. This is reason for concern, because even a small percentage of misclassified former smokers may bias the estimated relative risk of mortality associated with current smoking to a considerable extent. Because former smoking status cannot be measured correctly, the percentage of former smokers may be calculated by modeling the percentage of ever smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8017403     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  Who are these "nonsmokers"?

Authors:  J R Hughes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Smoking and the compression of morbidity.

Authors:  W J Nusselder; C W Looman; P J Marang-van de Mheen; H van de Mheen; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Chapter 10: A macro-model of smoking and lung cancer: examining aggregate trends in lung cancer rates using the CPS-I and CPS-II and two-stage clonal expansion models.

Authors:  David T Levy; Kenneth Blackman; Eduard Zaloshnja
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Chapter 5: Actual and counterfactual smoking prevalence rates in the U.S. population via microsimulation.

Authors:  Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza; Martin Krapcho; Lauren D Clarke; Jeff Byrne; David T Levy
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Long-term concentrations of ambient air pollutants and incident lung cancer in California adults: results from the AHSMOG study.Adventist Health Study on Smog.

Authors:  W L Beeson; D E Abbey; S F Knutsen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Gender and age differences among current smokers in a general population survey.

Authors:  Ulrich John; Monika Hanke; Christian Meyer; Anja Schumann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.