Literature DB >> 16157944

Measuring physical activity during pregnancy.

Glenda Lindseth1, Patty Vari.   

Abstract

Few studies exist that identify a useful self-report measure of physical activity for pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to compare the self-report exercise diary with the pedometer and determine if self-report measurement provided useful physical activity measures during pregnancy. The pregnant women's sleep, parity, and related demographic factors were further analyzed for relationships to the physical activity measures. Physical activity was assessed in a sample of 94 pregnant midwestern U.S. women ages 18 to 38 years. The women wore a pedometer during all waking hours for 3 consecutive days at 14 and 28 weeks of pregnancy for a total of 6 days. During the same 6 days of monitoring, the women kept a diary account of the minutes they exercised per day. The pedometer and self-report exercise diary results correlated significantly (r = 49, p = .02). When examining for usefulness in measuring physical activity, a comparison of the women's occupational categories revealed no significant differences in self-reported minutes of exercise or pedometer counts per day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16157944     DOI: 10.1177/0193945905276523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.967


  14 in total

Review 1.  Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Danielle Symons Downs; Emily E Pearce
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Measuring physical activity during pregnancy.

Authors:  Cheryce L Harrison; Russell G Thompson; Helena J Teede; Catherine B Lombard
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Optimising the validity and completion of adherence diaries: a multiple case study and randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Rachael Frost; Doreen McClurg; Marian Brady; Brian Williams
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Physical activity and persistent low back pain and pelvic pain post partum.

Authors:  Ingrid M Mogren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Physical activity and pregnancy: past and present evidence and future recommendations.

Authors:  Danielle Symons Downs; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Kelly R Evenson; Jenn Leiferman; SeonAe Yeo
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Is intensive counseling in maternity care feasible and effective in promoting physical activity among women at risk for gestational diabetes? Secondary analysis of a cluster randomized NELLI study in Finland.

Authors:  Minna Aittasalo; Jani Raitanen; Tarja I Kinnunen; Katriina Ojala; Päivi Kolu; Riitta Luoto
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 7.  Preventing long-term risk of obesity for two generations: prenatal physical activity is part of the puzzle.

Authors:  Stephanie-May Ruchat; Michelle F Mottola
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2012-12-17

8.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stéphanie A Prince; Kristi B Adamo; Meghan E Hamel; Jill Hardt; Sarah Connor Gorber; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  The Turkish version of the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Ozge Celiker Tosun; Ulas Solmaz; Atalay Ekin; Gokhan Tosun; Ebru Kaya Mutlu; Emre Okyay; Mehmet Adiyeke; Cenk Gezer; Emre Mat; Mehtap Malkoc
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-10-30

10.  Travel patterns during pregnancy: comparison between Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking and questionnaire data.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Chengsheng Jiang; Guillermo Jaimes; Scott Bartell; Andy Dang; Dean Baker; Ralph J Delfino
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.