| Literature DB >> 22882757 |
Suresh Kumar1, Neeru Vasudeva, Sunil Sharma.
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY: This study was made to investigate the antidiabetic, antioxidant and hypolipidemic potential of Cinnamomum tamala, (Buch.-Ham.) Nees & Eberm (Tejpat) oil (CTO) in streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetes in rats along with evaluation of chemical constituents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22882757 PMCID: PMC3461457 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-95
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Figure 1GC-MS chromatogram of oil shows 31 peaks which indicates that 31 compounds are present in the plant oil.
Chemical composition of essential oil Total components of the oil 99.99%
| 1 | Alpha-pinene | 3.621 | 0.095% |
| 2 | Camphene | 3.864 | 0.037% |
| 3 | Benzaldehyde | 4.050 | 1.222% |
| 4 | Beta-pinene | 4.312 | 0.034% |
| 5 | p-cymene | 5.166 | 0.065% |
| 6 | Beta-Phellandrene | 5.270 | 0.106% |
| 7 | Acetophenone | 6.153 | 0.044% |
| 8 | Linalool | 6.850 | 0.442% |
| 9 | Beta-phenylpropionaldehyde | 8.608 | 1.856% |
| 10 | Phenetol | 8.775 | 0.109% |
| 11 | Benzofuran | 9.006 | 0.185% |
| 12 | Acrolein | 10.285 | 0.286% |
| 14 | 2-propenal, 3-phenyl cinnamaldehyde | 12.249 | 0.087% |
| 15 | Eugenol | 14.473 | 0.078% |
| 16 | Hydro cinnamyl acetate | 14.836 | 3.384% |
| 17 | Alpha-copaene | 14.980 | 0.414% |
| 18 | Pivalic acid | 15.340 | 0.129% |
| 19 | Cinnamyl acetate | 15.450 | 0.091% |
| 20 | Methyl eugenol | 15.909 | 0.107% |
| 21 | Beta-caryophyllene | 16.329 | 2.669% |
| 22 | Valecene | 16.910 | 0.089% |
| 24 | Alpha-humulene | 17.365 | 0.636% |
| 25 | Bicyclogermacrene-lepdozene | 18.658 | 0.191% |
| 26 | Naphthalene | 19.455 | 0.067% |
| 27 | Spathulenol | 21.108 | 0.780% |
| 28 | Caryophyllene oxide | 21.230 | 1.135% |
| 29 | Alpha-patchoulene | 21.547 | 0.090% |
| 30 | Humulene oxide | 21.993 | 0.097% |
Effect of oil in Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
| Normal | ---- | 85±4.6 | 147 ±2.3 | 110 ± 2.9 | 97 ± 3.5 | 89 ± 3.0 |
| Diabetic control | ---- | 270 ± 8.6 | 399 ± 6.3 | 419.2 ± 3.2 | 369 ± 3.6 | 341 ± 4.9 |
| CTO | 100 mg/kg | 255 ± 4.8 | 279 ± 3.9 | 318 ± 4.0 | 299 ± 5.6** | 280 ± 3.2** |
| CTO | 200 mg/kg | 257 ± 4.9 | 282 ± 4.1 | 343 ± 3.9 | 286 ± 2.5** | 239 ± 3.8** |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 20 mg/kg | 252 ± 4.0 | 287 ± 5.7 | 356 ± 2.1 | 275 ± 4.2** | 228 ± 2.9** |
Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test **p < 0.01 vs. diabetic control; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil.
Acute hypoglycaemic effect of oil on STZ induced diabetic rats
| Normal | -- | 76 ± 4.2 | 80 ± 3.2 | 77 ± 2.5 | 82 ± 4.1 | 79 ± 5.3 |
| Control | -- | 340.5 ± 10.2 | 342 ± 11.3 | 346 ± 7.6 | 341.0 ± 6.7 | 332.0 ± 7.2 |
| CTO | 100 mg/kg p.o | 356 ± 6.7 | 334.1 ± 6.2 | 308 ± 3.6** | 301 ± 3.0** | 292 ± 3.3** |
| CTO | 200 mg/kg p.o | 347 ± 1.8 | 324 ± 0.7* | 301 ± 2.3** | 295 ± 1.5** | 272 ± 6.5** |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 20 mg/kg p.o | 329 ± 3.2 | 302 ± 4.2** | 299 ± 3.2** | 270 ± 4.6** | 262 ± 5.3** |
| Glibenclamide | 0.6 mg/kg p.o | 334 ± 3.1 | 320 ± 2.9** | 296 ± 3.9** | 279 ± 4.9** | 260.0 ± 4.2** |
Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. diabetic control; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil.
Chronic hypoglycaemic effect of oil on STZ induced diabetic rats
| Normal | -- | 80 ± 4.2 | 79 ± 3.2 | 82 ± 2.5 | 85.5 ± 4.1 | 78 ± 2.1 |
| Control | -- | 380 ± 7.3 | 379 ± 7.6 | 384 ± 6.7 | 416 ± 7.2 | 410 ± 5.4 |
| CTO | 100 mg/kg p.o | 304 ± 12.4 | 290 ± 8.6** | 276 ± 7.8** | 250 ± 9.9** | 201 ± 10.2** |
| CTO | 200 mg/kg p.o | 312 ± 5.7 | 269 ± 6.3** | 176 ± 5.5** | 146 ± 4.5** | 118 ± 5.5** |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 20 mg/kg p.o | 334 ± 3.4 | 287 ± 4.2** | 188 ± 3.2** | 159 ± 4.6** | 124 ± 3.2** |
| Glibenclamide | 0.6 mg/kg p.o | 328 ± 3.1 | 265 ± 2.9** | 172 ± 3.9** | 142 ± 4.9** | 117 ± 2.7** |
Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test **p < 0.01 vs. diabetic control; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil.
Effect of oil on body weight
| 1. | Normal | -- | 220 ± 1.1 | 235 ± 1.5 | +15 |
| 2. | Diabetic Control | -- | 215 ± 1.8 | 195 ± 2.0 | −20a |
| 4. | CTO | 100 mg/kg p.o | 230 ± 2.2 | 225 ± 1.0 | −5 |
| 5. | CTO | 200 mg/kg p.o | 220 ± 1.3 | 210 ± 1.2 | −10** |
| 6. | Cinnamaldehyde | 20 mg/kg p.o | 230 ± 2.0 | 225 ± 1.4 | −05** |
| 7. | Glibenclamide | 0.6 mg/kg p.o | 220 ± 1.8 | 215 ± 1.1 | −05** |
Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M.; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test a p < 0.01 vs. normal; **p < 0.01 vs. diabetic control; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil.
Effect of oil on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hepatic glycogen and insulin
| Normal | -- | 6 ± 1.4 | 75 ± 6.7 | 15 ± 2.2 |
| Diabetic Control | -- | 10.8 ± 2.3a | 28 ± 4.6a | 7.8 ± 1.2a |
| CTO | 100 mg/kg | 9.0 ± 3.2 | 46 ± 2.3* | 9.8 ± 2.2 |
| CTO | 200 mg/kg | 7.4 ± 1.6** | 62 ± 4.6** | 12 ± 2.1* |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 20 mg/kg | 7.0 ± 0.6** | 66 ± 2.3** | 13 ± 1.6* |
| Glibenclamide | 0.6 mg/kg | 6.8 ± 0.9** | 64 ± 3.4** | 12.5 ± 1.8* |
Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test ap < 0.01 vs. normal; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. diabetic control; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil.
Effect of oil on Lipid profile
| Normal | -- | 84 ± 1.4 | 15 ± 2.6 | 60 ± 2.1 |
| Diabetic Control | -- | 222 ± 2.3a | 40 ± 3.2a | 36.4 ± 1.2a |
| CTO | 100 mg/kg | 160 ± 3.2** | 28 ± 1.8** | 45 ± 3.1 |
| CTO | 200 mg/kg | 100 ± 1.6** | 20 ± 2.3** | 52 ± 2.4* |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 20 mg/kg | 110 ± 0.6** | 18.2 ± 1.7** | 55 ± 1.3** |
| Glibenclamide | 0.6 mg/kg | 130 ± 0.9** | 14.8 ± 1.3** | 51.2 ± 1.6* |
Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test a p < 0.01 vs. normal; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. diabetic control; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil.
Effect of oil and positive controls on Assays (DPPH, Superoxide and metal chelating Assay)
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CTO | 250 ± 1.2 | 180 ± 1.4 | 350 ± 1.3 |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 120 ± 0.8 | 140 ± 1.1 | 240 ± 0.9 |
| BHT | 19 ± 0.1 | 40 ± 0.2 | -- |
| BHA | 18.3 ± 0.1 | 54 ± 0.2 | -- |
| EDTA | -- | -- | 220 ± 0.2 |
BHA: Butylated hydroxy aniline; BHT: Butylated hydroxy toluene; EDTA: Ethylene diammine tetra acetic acid; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil; --: Not tested.
Effect of oil on MDA and GSH
| Normal | -- | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 40.2 ± 2.8 |
| Diabetic Control | -- | 5.2 ± 0.4 a | 14 ± 1.15 a |
| CTO | 100 mg/kg | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 20 ± 2.3 |
| CTO | 200 mg/kg | 3.2 ± 0.2** | 32 ± 4.6** |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 20 mg/kg | 3.0 ± 0.1** | 34 ± 1.1** |
| Glibenclamide | 0.6 mg/kg | 2.8 ± 0.1** | 36 ± 2.8** |
Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test ap < 0.01 vs. normal; **p < 0.01 vs. diabetic control; CTO: Cinnamomum tamala oil.