OBJECTIVES: Tumour xenografts of well-discernible sizes can be examined well by molecular ultrasound. Here, we investigated whether very early breast carcinomas express sufficient levels of VEGFR2 for reliable molecular ultrasound imaging with targeted microbubbles. METHODS: MCF-7 breast cancer xenografts were orthotopically implanted in nude mice (n = 26). Tumours measuring from 4 mm(3) (2 mm diameter) up to 65 mm(3) (5 mm diameter) were examined with automated 3D molecular ultrasound using clinically translatable VEGFR2-targeted microbubbles (BR55). Additionally, the relative tumour blood volume was assessed with non-targeted microbubbles (BR38). In vivo ultrasound data were validated by quantitative immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Very small lesions 2 mm in diameter showed the highest binding of VEGFR2-specific microbubbles. In larger tumours significantly less BR55 accumulated (p = 0.023). Nonetheless, binding of VEGFR2-targeted microbubbles was still high enough for imaging. The relative blood volume was comparable at all tumour sizes. Both findings were confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, a significantly enhanced number of large and mature vessels were detected with increasing tumour size (p < 0.01), explaining the decrease in VEGFR2 expression during tumour growth. CONCLUSIONS: 3D molecular ultrasound using BR55 is very well suited to depicting the angiogenic activity in very small breast lesions, suggesting its potential for detecting and characterising these lesions.
OBJECTIVES:Tumour xenografts of well-discernible sizes can be examined well by molecular ultrasound. Here, we investigated whether very early breast carcinomas express sufficient levels of VEGFR2 for reliable molecular ultrasound imaging with targeted microbubbles. METHODS: MCF-7 breast cancer xenografts were orthotopically implanted in nude mice (n = 26). Tumours measuring from 4 mm(3) (2 mm diameter) up to 65 mm(3) (5 mm diameter) were examined with automated 3D molecular ultrasound using clinically translatable VEGFR2-targeted microbubbles (BR55). Additionally, the relative tumour blood volume was assessed with non-targeted microbubbles (BR38). In vivo ultrasound data were validated by quantitative immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Very small lesions 2 mm in diameter showed the highest binding of VEGFR2-specific microbubbles. In larger tumours significantly less BR55 accumulated (p = 0.023). Nonetheless, binding of VEGFR2-targeted microbubbles was still high enough for imaging. The relative blood volume was comparable at all tumour sizes. Both findings were confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, a significantly enhanced number of large and mature vessels were detected with increasing tumour size (p < 0.01), explaining the decrease in VEGFR2 expression during tumour growth. CONCLUSIONS: 3D molecular ultrasound using BR55 is very well suited to depicting the angiogenic activity in very small breast lesions, suggesting its potential for detecting and characterising these lesions.
Authors: Peter Vajkoczy; Mohammad Farhadi; Andreas Gaumann; Regina Heidenreich; Ralf Erber; Andreas Wunder; Jörg C Tonn; Michael D Menger; Georg Breier Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Dilantha B Ellegala; Howard Leong-Poi; Joan E Carpenter; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Mark E Shaffrey; Jiri Sklenar; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jürgen K Willmann; Zhen Cheng; Corrine Davis; Amelie M Lutz; Meike L Schipper; Carsten H Nielsen; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Howard Leong-Poi; Jonathan Christiansen; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-01-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alastair Thompson; Keith Brennan; Angela Cox; Julia Gee; Diana Harcourt; Adrian Harris; Michelle Harvie; Ingunn Holen; Anthony Howell; Robert Nicholson; Michael Steel; Charles Streuli Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Amelie M Lutz; Sunitha V Bachawal; Charles W Drescher; Marybeth A Pysz; Jürgen K Willmann; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hua Zhang; Sarah Tam; Elizabeth S Ingham; Lisa M Mahakian; Chun-Yen Lai; Spencer K Tumbale; Tambet Teesalu; Neil E Hubbard; Alexander D Borowsky; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Igor Spivak; Anne Rix; Georg Schmitz; Stanley Fokong; Olga Iranzo; Wiltrud Lederle; Fabian Kiessling Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Hua Zhang; Elizabeth S Ingham; M Karen J Gagnon; Lisa M Mahakian; Jingfei Liu; Josquin L Foiret; Juergen K Willmann; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Jianhua Zhou; Huaijun Wang; Huiping Zhang; Amelie M Lutz; Lu Tian; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 12.701