OBJECTIVES: To characterise clinically translatable long-circulating (BR38) and VEGFR2-targeted (BR55) microbubbles (MB) and to assess their ability to discriminate breast cancer models with different aggressiveness. METHODS: The circulation characteristics of BR38 and BR55 were investigated in healthy mice. The relative blood volume (rBV) of MDA-MB-231 (n = 5) or MCF-7 (n = 6) tumours was determined using BR38. In the same tumours in-vivo binding specificity of BR55 was tested and VEGFR2 expression assessed. Data validation included quantitative immunohistological analysis. RESULTS: BR38 had a longer blood half-life than BR55 (>600 s vs. 218 s). BR38-enhanced ultrasound showed greater vascularisation in MDA-MB-231 tumours (p = 0.022), which was in line with immunohistology (p = 0.033). In-vivo competitive binding experiments proved the specificity of BR55 to VEGFR2 (p = 0.027). Binding of BR55 was significantly higher in MDA-MB-231 than in MCF-7 tumours (p = 0.049), which corresponded with the VEGFR2 levels found histologically (p = 0.015). However, differences became smaller when normalising the levels of BR55 to the rBV. CONCLUSIONS: BR38 and BR55 are well suited to characterising and distinguishing breast cancers with different angiogenesis and aggressiveness. Long-circulating BR38 MB allow extensive 3-dimensional examinations of larger or several organs. BR55 accumulation faithfully reflects the VEGFR2 status in tumours and depicts even small differences in angiogenesis.
OBJECTIVES: To characterise clinically translatable long-circulating (BR38) and VEGFR2-targeted (BR55) microbubbles (MB) and to assess their ability to discriminate breast cancer models with different aggressiveness. METHODS: The circulation characteristics of BR38 and BR55 were investigated in healthy mice. The relative blood volume (rBV) of MDA-MB-231 (n = 5) or MCF-7 (n = 6) tumours was determined using BR38. In the same tumours in-vivo binding specificity of BR55 was tested and VEGFR2 expression assessed. Data validation included quantitative immunohistological analysis. RESULTS: BR38 had a longer blood half-life than BR55 (>600 s vs. 218 s). BR38-enhanced ultrasound showed greater vascularisation in MDA-MB-231 tumours (p = 0.022), which was in line with immunohistology (p = 0.033). In-vivo competitive binding experiments proved the specificity of BR55 to VEGFR2 (p = 0.027). Binding of BR55 was significantly higher in MDA-MB-231 than in MCF-7 tumours (p = 0.049), which corresponded with the VEGFR2 levels found histologically (p = 0.015). However, differences became smaller when normalising the levels of BR55 to the rBV. CONCLUSIONS: BR38 and BR55 are well suited to characterising and distinguishing breast cancers with different angiogenesis and aggressiveness. Long-circulating BR38 MB allow extensive 3-dimensional examinations of larger or several organs. BR55 accumulation faithfully reflects the VEGFR2 status in tumours and depicts even small differences in angiogenesis.
Authors: A Shrivastava; M A von Wronski; A K Sato; D T Dransfield; D Sexton; N Bogdan; R Pillai; P Nanjappan; B Song; E Marinelli; D DeOliveira; C Luneau; M Devlin; A Muruganandam; A Abujoub; G Connelly; Q L Wu; G Conley; Q Chang; M F Tweedle; R C Ladner; R E Swenson; A D Nunn Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2005-08-08 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Andrej Lyshchik; Arthur C Fleischer; Jessica Huamani; Dennis E Hallahan; Marcela Brissova; John C Gore Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Jürgen K Willmann; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Kai Chen; Olivier Gheysens; Martin Rodriguez-Porcel; Amelie M Lutz; Ian Y Chen; Xiaoyuan Chen; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Amelie M Lutz; Sunitha V Bachawal; Charles W Drescher; Marybeth A Pysz; Jürgen K Willmann; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hua Zhang; Sarah Tam; Elizabeth S Ingham; Lisa M Mahakian; Chun-Yen Lai; Spencer K Tumbale; Tambet Teesalu; Neil E Hubbard; Alexander D Borowsky; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Rakesh Bam; Patrick S Lown; Lawrence A Stern; Karina Sharma; Katheryne E Wilson; Gregory R Bean; Amelie M Lutz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Benjamin J Hackel; Jeremy Dahl; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Elizabeth B Herbst; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Shiying Wang; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; Frank William Mauldin Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Sunitha V Bachawal; Kristin C Jensen; Amelie M Lutz; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Francois Tranquart; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dongwoon Hyun; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem; Rakesh Bam; Leandra L Brickson; Carl D Herickhoff; Jeremy J Dahl Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Mario L Fabiilli; Morand R Piert; Robert A Koeppe; Phillip S Sherman; Carole A Quesada; Oliver D Kripfgans Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.161