Literature DB >> 22878262

Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Chris H Bangma1, Meelan Bul, Theo H van der Kwast, Tom Pickles, Ida J Korfage, Caroline M Hoeks, Ewout W Steyerberg, Guido Jenster, Michael W Kattan, Lara Bellardita, Peter R Carroll, Louis J Denis, Chris Parker, Monique J Roobol, Mark Emberton, Laurence H Klotz, Antti Rannikko, Yoshiyuki Kakehi, Janet A Lane, Fritz H Schröder, Axel Semjonow, Bruce J Trock, Riccardo Valdagni.   

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is an important management strategy for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The need for AS is increasing due to the awareness that many PCa are identified that show a low growth potential and therefore are likely to remain clinically asymptomatic during the lifetime of an individual. Currently there is no good method to prevent the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers upfront. During the last decade, several studies on AS around the world have made observations that feed the discussion on how to select and monitor these patients, how to proceed with the research to develop a better and more precise clinical definition of indolent cancers and how to manage men under AS clinically. Furthermore, patients' perspectives have become clearer, and quality of life studies give direction to the practical approach and care for patients and partners. This paper reflects the consensus on the state of the art and the future direction of AS, based on the Inside Track Conference "Active Surveillance for low risk prostate cancer" (Chairmen: C.H. Bangma, NL, and L. Klotz, CA; Co-Chairmen: L.J. Denis, BE, and C. Parker, UK; Scientific Coordinators: M. J. Roobol, NL, and E.W. Steyerberg, NL), organized by the European School of Oncology in collaboration with Europa Uomo in Rotterdam, the Netherlands in January 2012. Topics for discussion were the optimisation of patient selection based on indolent disease definition, the incorporation of therapeutic agents into AS programs, the optimisation of patient care, and the application of emerging technologies and biomarkers.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22878262     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  15 in total

1.  Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Daniel T Keefe; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Kevin Hogan; Eric C Belanger; Kien T Mai; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Role for (11)C-choline PET in active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oleksandr Boychak; Larissa Vos; William Makis; Francois-Alexandre Buteau; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew Parliament; Alexander J B McEwan; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Validation of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Michael Nguyentat; Alexander Ushinsky; Alessandra Miranda-Aguirre; Edward Uchio; Chandana Lall; Layla Shirkhoda; Thomas Lee; Christopher Green; Roozbeh Houshyar
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2017-10-12

4.  Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.

Authors:  Larissa J Vos; Michele Janoski; Keith Wachowicz; Atiyah Yahya; Oleksandr Boychak; John Amanie; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew B Parliament; Edith Pituskin; B Gino Fallone; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 5.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Measurement of serum prostate cancer markers using a nanopore thin film based optofluidic chip.

Authors:  Salah Alzghoul; Mohammad Hailat; Sandra Zivanovic; Long Que; Girish V Shah
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 10.618

8.  Complex-I Alteration and Enhanced Mitochondrial Fusion Are Associated With Prostate Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Julie V Philley; Anbarasu Kannan; Wenyi Qin; Edward R Sauter; Mitsuo Ikebe; Kate L Hertweck; Dean A Troyer; Oliver J Semmes; Santanu Dasgupta
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.384

9.  A multicenter study shows PTEN deletion is strongly associated with seminal vesicle involvement and extracapsular extension in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dean A Troyer; Tamara Jamaspishvili; Wei Wei; Ziding Feng; Jennifer Good; Sarah Hawley; Ladan Fazli; Jesse K McKenney; Jeff Simko; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Peter R Carroll; Martin Gleave; Raymond Lance; Daniel W Lin; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Lawrence D True; James D Brooks; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy.

Authors:  Adam W Nelson; Rebecca C Harvey; Richard A Parker; Christof Kastner; Andrew Doble; Vincent J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.