T Illies1, N D Forkert, T Ries, J Regelsberger, J Fiehler. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. t.illies@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 4D MRA has been evolving as a noninvasive supplement for DSA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed blood flow visualization technique for the classification of cerebral AVMs. We hypothesized that 4D-hMRA allows detection of different flow patterns within the nidus as well as differentiation of feeders and draining veins and has very good agreement with DSA regarding the Spetzler-Martin grade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with AVMs were evaluated by using 4D-hMRA and DSA by 2 blinded raters. Rating criteria included Spetzler-Martin score and other morphologic variables together with a new scale for 3 intranidal flow patterns (homogeneous = 1, unidirectional = 2, heterogeneous = 3). RESULTS: The Spetzler-Martin grades were rated different from DSA in 5 cases by rater 1 and in 3 cases by rater 2 with an excellent interrater reliability of κ = 0.96 (4/31, 1 by size and 3 by drainage). Each reader missed 5 feeders on 4D-hMRA. Draining veins were distinguished in the temporal course in 7 on DSA but in 8 and 12 on 4D-hybrid-MRA (raters 1 and 2 respectively), with κ = 0.79. A type 1 intranidal flow pattern was recognizable in 9 (30%) patients; type 2, in 19 (60%); and type 3, in 3 (10%). CONCLUSIONS: 4D-hMRA allows reliable Spetzler-Martin grading and detection of brain arteriovenous malformation feeding arteries and draining veins, with the drawback that for small vessels DSA is still needed. Draining veins might even be detected with higher sensitivity than on DSA. Discrimination of different intranidal flow patterns is possible, but their relevance for hemorrhage risk assessment and therapy planning requires further study.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 4D MRA has been evolving as a noninvasive supplement for DSA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed blood flow visualization technique for the classification of cerebral AVMs. We hypothesized that 4D-hMRA allows detection of different flow patterns within the nidus as well as differentiation of feeders and draining veins and has very good agreement with DSA regarding the Spetzler-Martin grade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with AVMs were evaluated by using 4D-hMRA and DSA by 2 blinded raters. Rating criteria included Spetzler-Martin score and other morphologic variables together with a new scale for 3 intranidal flow patterns (homogeneous = 1, unidirectional = 2, heterogeneous = 3). RESULTS: The Spetzler-Martin grades were rated different from DSA in 5 cases by rater 1 and in 3 cases by rater 2 with an excellent interrater reliability of κ = 0.96 (4/31, 1 by size and 3 by drainage). Each reader missed 5 feeders on 4D-hMRA. Draining veins were distinguished in the temporal course in 7 on DSA but in 8 and 12 on 4D-hybrid-MRA (raters 1 and 2 respectively), with κ = 0.79. A type 1 intranidal flow pattern was recognizable in 9 (30%) patients; type 2, in 19 (60%); and type 3, in 3 (10%). CONCLUSIONS: 4D-hMRA allows reliable Spetzler-Martin grading and detection of brain arteriovenous malformation feeding arteries and draining veins, with the drawback that for small vessels DSA is still needed. Draining veins might even be detected with higher sensitivity than on DSA. Discrimination of different intranidal flow patterns is possible, but their relevance for hemorrhage risk assessment and therapy planning requires further study.
Authors: Nils Daniel Forkert; Jens Fiehler; Thorsten Ries; Till Illies; Dietmar Möller; Heinz Handels; Dennis Säring Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: S Nishimura; T Hirai; A Sasao; M Kitajima; M Morioka; Y Kai; Y Omori; T Okuda; R Murakami; H Fukuoka; K Awai; J-I Kuratsu; Y Yamashita Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Dariusch R Hadizadeh; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Jürgen Gieseke; Bernhard Meyer; Horst Urbach; Romhild Hoogeveen; Hans H Schild; Winfried A Willinek Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-10-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rustam Al-Shahi; Nandita Pal; Steff C Lewis; Jo J Bhattacharya; Robin J Sellar; Charles P Warlow Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Guido M Kukuk; Dariusch R Hadizadeh; Azize Boström; Jürgen Gieseke; Julia Bergener; Michael Nelles; Petra Mürtz; Horst Urbach; Hans H Schild; Winfried A Willinek Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: D L Bell; T M Leslie-Mazwi; A J Yoo; J D Rabinov; W E Butler; J E Bell; J A Hirsch Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tilman Schubert; Yijing Wu; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Jane Maksimovic; Charles Mistretta; Patrick Turski Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Nils Daniel Forkert; Till Illies; Einar Goebell; Jens Fiehler; Dennis Säring; Heinz Handels Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: S A Ansari; S Schnell; T Carroll; P Vakil; M C Hurley; C Wu; J Carr; B R Bendok; H Batjer; M Markl Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 3.825