Literature DB >> 8419427

Intracranial MRA: single volume vs. multiple thin slab 3D time-of-flight acquisition.

W L Davis1, S H Warnock, H R Harnsberger, D L Parker, C X Chen.   

Abstract

Single volume three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography is the most commonly used noninvasive method for evaluating the intracranial vasculature. The sensitivity of this technique to signal loss from flow saturation limits its utility. A recently developed multislab 3D TOF technique, MOTSA, is less affected by flow saturation and would therefore be expected to yield improved vessel visualization. To study this hypothesis, intracranial MR angiograms were obtained on 10 volunteers using three techniques: MOTSA, single volume 3D TOF using a standard 4.9 ms TE (3D TOFA), and single volume 3D TOF using a 6.8 ms TE (3D TOFB). All three sets of axial source images and maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were reviewed. Each exam was evaluated for the number of intracranial vessels visualized. A total of 502 vessel segments were studied with each technique. With use of the MIP images, 86% of selected vessels were visualized with MOTSA, 64% with 3D TOFA (TE = 4.9 ms), and 67% with TOFB (TE = 6.8 ms). Similarly, with the axial source images, 91% of selected vessels were visualized with MOTSA, 77% with 3D TOFA (TE = 4.9 ms), and 82% with 3D TOFB (TE = 6.8 ms). There is improved visualization of selected intracranial vessels in normal volunteers with MOTSA as compared with single volume 3D TOF. These improvements are believed to be primarily a result of decreased sensitivity to flow saturation seen with the MOTSA technique. No difference in overall vessel visualization was noted for the two single volume 3D TOF techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8419427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  7 in total

1.  3D MR angiography with ramp-shaped flip-angle distribution.

Authors:  J Martos; T Nägele; U Klose; D Petersen; K Voigt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and intranidal flow patterns by color-encoded 4D-hybrid-MRA.

Authors:  T Illies; N D Forkert; T Ries; J Regelsberger; J Fiehler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils.

Authors:  Charles B L M Majoie; Marieke E Sprengers; Willem Jan J van Rooij; Cristina Lavini; Menno Sluzewski; Jeroen C van Rijn; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Super-resolution intracranial quiescent interval slice-selective magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic resonance angiography of supratentorial tumours: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  G Wilms; H Bosmans; G Marchal; P Demaerel; J Goffin; C Plets; A L Baert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  High-resolution postcontrast time-of-flight MR angiography of intracranial perforators at 7.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Anita A Harteveld; Laurens J L De Cocker; Nikki Dieleman; Anja G van der Kolk; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Pierre A Robe; Peter R Luijten; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging to visualize stroke and characterize stroke recovery: a review.

Authors:  Bradley J Macintosh; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.