Literature DB >> 22876152

Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience.

X Zhu1, N Bouganim, L Vandermeer, S F Dent, G Dranitsaris, M J Clemons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf) as primary prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia has significant cost implications. We examined use of g-csf for early-stage breast cancer patients at our centre. The study also examined the pattern of nurse-led patient teaching with respect to drug self-administration.
METHODS: Patients who received g-csf between November 2009 and October 2010 were identified from pharmacy records. After consent had been obtained, electronic charts were examined to extract data on chemotherapy and use of g-csf. Patients were contacted by telephone to obtain information on the utilization of home-care nursing visits for g-csf administration.
RESULTS: The study analyzed 36 patients. Median age was 58 years (range: 31-78 years). Of the 36 patients, 30 (83%) had received adjuvant treatment, and 6 (17%), neoadjuvant treatment. Most patients (71%) received 10 days (range: 7-10 days) of filgrastim. Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) received g-csf as primary prophylaxis. In 90% of those patients, primary prophylaxis commenced with the taxane component of treatment. Of the 36 patients, 7 (19%) received g-csf after neutropenia, including 2 who had febrile neutropenia. In 96% of the patients, injections were received at home with the help of a nurse; those patients were subsequently taught self-injection techniques. The median number of nursing visits was 2 (range: 1-3 visits). Most patients were satisfied with the home care and g-csf teaching they received.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the g-csf used in breast cancer treatment during the study period was given for primary prophylaxis. A major reason for the decision to use g-csf appears to have been physician-perceived risk of febrile neutropenia. Delivery of g-csf by home-care nurses was well received by patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Growth factor; breast cancer; chemotherapy; drug administration; febrile neutropenia; neutropenia; prophylaxis

Year:  2012        PMID: 22876152      PMCID: PMC3410835          DOI: 10.3747/co.19.948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  14 in total

Review 1.  Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.

Authors:  P Edwards; I Roberts; M Clarke; C DiGuiseppi; S Pratap; R Wentz; I Kwan; R Cooper
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

2.  First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

Authors:  Charles L Vogel; Marek Z Wojtukiewicz; Robert R Carroll; Sergei A Tjulandin; Luis Javier Barajas-Figueroa; Brian L Wiens; Theresa A Neumann; Lee S Schwartzberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  High rate of febrile neutropenia in patients with operable breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Derrick Soong; Reem Haj; Mova G Leung; Robert Myers; Brian Higgins; Jeff Myers; Sudha Rajagopal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Real-world experience with adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in four Ontario regional cancer centres.

Authors:  Y Madarnas; S F Dent; S F Husain; A Robinson; S Alkhayyat; W M Hopman; J L Verreault; T Vandenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alexandre Chan; Wing Hang Fu; Vivianne Shih; Jurja Chua Coyuco; Sze Huey Tan; Raymond Ng
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Zhimei Liu; Rob Boer; Sean D Sullivan; Jennifer Malin; Quan V Doan; Robert W Dubois; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Docetaxel With Cyclophosphamide Is Associated With an Overall Survival Benefit Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: 7-Year Follow-Up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735.

Authors:  Stephen Jones; Frankie Ann Holmes; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Joanne L Blum; Svetislava J Vukelja; Kristi J McIntyre; John E Pippen; James H Bordelon; Robert L Kirby; John Sandbach; William J Hyman; Donald A Richards; Robert G Mennel; Kristi A Boehm; Wally G Meyer; Lina Asmar; Daniel Mackey; Stefan Riedel; Hyman Muss; Michael A Savin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  T Ferguson; N Wilcken; R Vagg; D Ghersi; A K Nowak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 9.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.

Authors:  Gary Lyman; Anjana Lalla; Richard Barron; Robert W Dubois
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.580

View more
  4 in total

1.  The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in a Canadian outpatient setting.

Authors:  S Fine; M Koo; T Gill; M Marin; M Poulin-Costello; R Barron; N Mittmann
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?

Authors:  Chris Skedgel; Daniel Rayson; Tallal Younis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Filgrastim use in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer-a survey of physicians and patients.

Authors:  John Hilton; Lisa Vandermeer; Marta Sienkiewicz; Sasha Mazzarello; Brian Hutton; Carol Stober; Dean Fergusson; Phillip Blanchette; Anil A Joy; A Brianne Bota; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Acute Zika Virus Infection in an Endemic Area Shows Modest Proinflammatory Systemic Immunoactivation and Cytokine-Symptom Associations.

Authors:  Jéssica Barletto de Sousa Barros; Paulo Alex Neves da Silva; Rosemary de Carvalho Rocha Koga; Patrícia Gonzalez-Dias; José Rodrigues Carmo Filho; Patrícia Resende Alo Nagib; Verônica Coelho; Helder I Nakaya; Simone Gonçalves Fonseca; Irmtraut Araci Hoffmann Pfrimer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 7.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.