John Hilton1,2,3, Lisa Vandermeer4, Marta Sienkiewicz4, Sasha Mazzarello4, Brian Hutton4,5, Carol Stober4, Dean Fergusson4,5, Phillip Blanchette6, Anil A Joy7, A Brianne Bota4, Mark Clemons8,4. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. jfhilton@toh.ca. 2. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. jfhilton@toh.ca. 3. Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada. jfhilton@toh.ca. 4. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 5. Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. 6. Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. 7. Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 8. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite its widespread use as primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis during chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, the optimal duration of daily filgrastim is unknown. Using the minimum effective duration may improve patient comfort and acceptability while reducing costs. Yet, suboptimal dosing may also negatively impact patient care. A survey was performed to obtain information regarding current practices for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use. METHODS: Canadian oncologists involved in the treatment of breast cancer patients, as well as patients who had received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, were surveyed. Standardized surveys were designed to collect information on perceived reasons for G-CSF use and current practices. RESULTS: The surveys were completed by 38/50 (76%) physicians and 95/97 (98%) patients. For physicians, there was variability in the choice of chemotherapy regimens that required G-CSF support, the dose of filgrastim prescribed and the number of days prescribed. The majority of physicians reported using 5 (31.6%), 7 (47.4%), or 10 (13.2%) days of therapy. Nearly half of the patients (46.3%) recalled having experienced at least one of the chemotherapy-related complications including chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, and FN. While on filgrastim, 66.3% of patients reported myalgia and bone pain. Both physicians and patients expressed interest in participating in clinical trials designed to optimize the duration of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in practice exists with respect to filgrastim administration. Definitive studies are therefore required to standardize and improve care, as this has the potential to impact treatment outcomes, patient quality of life, and cost savings.
PURPOSE: Despite its widespread use as primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis during chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, the optimal duration of daily filgrastim is unknown. Using the minimum effective duration may improve patient comfort and acceptability while reducing costs. Yet, suboptimal dosing may also negatively impact patient care. A survey was performed to obtain information regarding current practices for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use. METHODS: Canadian oncologists involved in the treatment of breast cancerpatients, as well as patients who had received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, were surveyed. Standardized surveys were designed to collect information on perceived reasons for G-CSF use and current practices. RESULTS: The surveys were completed by 38/50 (76%) physicians and 95/97 (98%) patients. For physicians, there was variability in the choice of chemotherapy regimens that required G-CSF support, the dose of filgrastim prescribed and the number of days prescribed. The majority of physicians reported using 5 (31.6%), 7 (47.4%), or 10 (13.2%) days of therapy. Nearly half of the patients (46.3%) recalled having experienced at least one of the chemotherapy-related complications including chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, and FN. While on filgrastim, 66.3% of patients reported myalgia and bone pain. Both physicians and patients expressed interest in participating in clinical trials designed to optimize the duration of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in practice exists with respect to filgrastim administration. Definitive studies are therefore required to standardize and improve care, as this has the potential to impact treatment outcomes, patient quality of life, and cost savings.
Authors: Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carmel Jacobs; Brian Hutton; Sasha Mazzarello; Stephanie Smith; Anil Joy; Eitan Amir; Mohammed F K Ibrahim; Nancy Gregario; Kelly Daigle; Lori Eggert; Mark Clemons Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-05-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ricardo Fernandes; Sasha Mazzarello; Carol Stober; Lisa Vandermeer; Shaan Dudani; Mohamed F K Ibrahim; Habeeb Majeed; Kirstin Perdrizet; Risa Shorr; Brian Hutton; Dean Fergusson; Mark Clemons Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ricardo Fernandes; Sasha Mazzarello; Brian Hutton; Risa Shorr; Mohammed F K Ibrahim; Carmel Jacobs; Michael Ong; Mark Clemons Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Stephen E Jones; Michael A Savin; Frankie Ann Holmes; Joyce A O'Shaughnessy; Joanne L Blum; Svetislava Vukelja; Kristi J McIntyre; John E Pippen; James H Bordelon; Robert Kirby; John Sandbach; William J Hyman; Pankaj Khandelwal; Angel G Negron; Donald A Richards; Stephen P Anthony; Robert G Mennel; Kristi A Boehm; Walter G Meyer; Lina Asmar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carmel Jacobs; Mark Clemons; Sasha Mazzarello; Brian Hutton; Anil A Joy; Muriel Brackstone; Orit Freedman; Lisa Vandermeer; Mohammed Ibrahim; Dean Fergusson; John Hilton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ricardo Fernandes; Sasha Mazzarello; Habeeb Majeed; Stephanie Smith; Risa Shorr; Brian Hutton; Mohammed Fk Ibrahim; Carmel Jacobs; Michael Ong; Mark Clemons Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mark Clemons; Sasha Mazzarello; John Hilton; Anil Joy; Julie Price-Hiller; Xiaofu Zhu; Shailendra Verma; Anne Kehoe; Mohammed Fk Ibrahim; Marta Sienkiewicz; Carol Stober; Lisa Vandermeer; Brian Hutton; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-08-11 Impact factor: 3.603