BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in pre- and post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Taxanes are highly active chemotherapy agents in metastatic breast cancer. Their role in early breast cancer was examined in this review. OBJECTIVES: To review the randomised evidence comparing taxane containing chemotherapy regimens with non-taxane containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of pre- or post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register was searched on 9th January 2007 using the codes for 'early breast cancer' and keywords for taxanes. Details of the search strategy used to create the register are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. The reference lists of other related literature reviews and articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing taxane containing regimens with non-taxane containing regimens in women with operable breast cancer. Women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected from published trials and abstracts. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality and the data extracted independently by two review authors. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary outcome measure. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted when reported. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 20 studies, 12 of these (7 full publications, 5 abstracts) had sufficient data published for inclusion (11 for OS and 11 for DFS) in the review. The weighted average median follow up was 60.4 months. All studies fulfilled quality criteria either adequately or well. Amongst 18,304 women with 2483 deaths, the HR for OS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.88, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. Amongst 19,943 women with 4800 events, the HR for DFS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.86, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. There was no statistical heterogeneity for either OS or DFS. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of studies supports the use of taxane containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens with improvement of overall survival and disease-free survival for women with operable early breast cancer. The review did not identify a subgroup of patients where taxane containing treatment may have been more or less effective. Dosage and scheduling of the taxane drug is not clearly defined and we await results of the next generation of studies to determine the optimal use of taxanes in early breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in pre- and post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Taxanes are highly active chemotherapy agents in metastatic breast cancer. Their role in early breast cancer was examined in this review. OBJECTIVES: To review the randomised evidence comparing taxane containing chemotherapy regimens with non-taxane containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of pre- or post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register was searched on 9th January 2007 using the codes for 'early breast cancer' and keywords for taxanes. Details of the search strategy used to create the register are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. The reference lists of other related literature reviews and articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing taxane containing regimens with non-taxane containing regimens in women with operable breast cancer. Women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected from published trials and abstracts. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality and the data extracted independently by two review authors. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary outcome measure. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted when reported. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 20 studies, 12 of these (7 full publications, 5 abstracts) had sufficient data published for inclusion (11 for OS and 11 for DFS) in the review. The weighted average median follow up was 60.4 months. All studies fulfilled quality criteria either adequately or well. Amongst 18,304 women with 2483 deaths, the HR for OS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.88, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. Amongst 19,943 women with 4800 events, the HR for DFS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.86, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. There was no statistical heterogeneity for either OS or DFS. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of studies supports the use of taxane containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens with improvement of overall survival and disease-free survival for women with operable early breast cancer. The review did not identify a subgroup of patients where taxane containing treatment may have been more or less effective. Dosage and scheduling of the taxane drug is not clearly defined and we await results of the next generation of studies to determine the optimal use of taxanes in early breast cancer.
Authors: Daniel P Fitzgerald; David L Emerson; Yongzhen Qian; Talha Anwar; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Sandra Silberman; Diane Palmieri; Patricia S Steeg Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Nicholas Chiu; Liying Zhang; Rebecca Dent; Angie Giotis; Jenna van Draanen; Daniela Gallo-Hershberg; Leonard Chiu; Ronald Chow; Bo Angela Wan; Mark Pasetka; Jordan Stinson; Erica Stacey; Sunil Verma; Henry Lam; Edward Chow; Carlo DeAngelis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-07-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Dieter Hölzel; Renate Eckel; Ingo Bauerfeind; Bernd Baier; Thomas Beck; Michael Braun; Johannes Ettl; Ulrich Hamann; Marion Kiechle; Sven Mahner; Christian Schindlbeck; Johann de Waal; Nadia Harbeck; Jutta Engel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Lori J Goldstein; Anne O'Neill; Joseph A Sparano; Edith A Perez; Lawrence N Shulman; Silvana Martino; Nancy E Davidson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul Ellis; Peter Barrett-Lee; Lindsay Johnson; David Cameron; Andrew Wardley; Susan O'Reilly; Mark Verrill; Ian Smith; John Yarnold; Robert Coleman; Helena Earl; Peter Canney; Chris Twelves; Christopher Poole; David Bloomfield; Penelope Hopwood; Stephen Johnston; Mitchell Dowsett; John M S Bartlett; Ian Ellis; Clare Peckitt; Emma Hall; Judith M Bliss Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Y Park; K Okamura; S Mitsuyama; T Saito; J Koh; S Kyono; K Higaki; M Ogita; T Asaga; H Inaji; H Komichi; N Kohno; K Yamazaki; F Tanaka; T Ito; H Nishikawa; A Osaki; H Koyama; T Suzuki Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 7.640