| Literature DB >> 22875719 |
Hendrik J Boiten1, Johannes N van der Sijde, Pauline R Ruitinga, Roelf Valkema, Marcel L Geleijnse, Eric J G Sijbrands, Ron T van Domburg, Arend F L Schinkel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exercise (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a useful tool for short- and medium-term risk stratifications. Currently, the long-term prognostic application of this technique has not been evaluated. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22875719 PMCID: PMC3462311 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9585-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Cardiol ISSN: 1071-3581 Impact factor: 5.952
Baseline characteristics
| n = 638 | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 56 ± 11 |
| Women | 210 (33) |
| Congestive heart failure | 70 (11) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 58 (9) |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 268 (42) |
| Hypertension | 275 (43) |
| Previous myocardial infarction | 171 (27) |
| Previous coronary artery bypass graft | 91 (11) |
| Previous percutaneous coronary intervention | 124 (19) |
| Known coronary artery disease | 294 (46) |
| Smoking | 153 (24) |
| Beta blockers | 261 (41) |
| Calcium antagonists | 269 (42) |
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival curves for major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal infarction, and coronary revascularization). Event-free survival was significantly different in patients with a normal and patients with abnormal exercise 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT. y, Years
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause mortality. Event-free survival was significantly different in patients with a normal and patients with abnormal exercise 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT. y, Years
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Event-free survival was significantly different in patients with a normal and patients with abnormal exercise 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT. y, Years
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier survival curves for revascularization. Event-free survival was significantly different in patients with a normal and patients with abnormal exercise 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT. y, Years
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction according to strata of coronary revascularization. Event-free survival was not significantly different between patients with and those without revascularization during follow-up. y, Years
Predictors of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal infarction, or revascularization) at univariable and multivariable analyses
| Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-imaging | Post-imaging I | Post-imaging II | Post-imaging III | ||
| Age* | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 1.05 (1.03–1.06) | 1.03 (1.01–1.04) | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 1.05 (1.03–1.08) |
| Male gender | 1.89 (1.50–2.39) | 1.80 (1.29–2.51) |
| 1.40 (1.09–1.79) | 1.97 (1.25–3.10) |
| Congestive heart failure |
|
|
|
|
|
| Diabetes mellitus |
| 1.96 (1.26–3.08) | 1.74 (1.13–2.69) |
| 2.36 (1.35–4.14) |
| History of angina |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hypercholesterolemia | 1.30 (1.06–1.60) |
|
|
|
|
| Hypertension |
|
|
|
|
|
| Previous infarction | 1.58 (1.26–1.97) | 1.71 (1.15–2.55) | 1.51 (1.10–2.08) | 1.33 (1.06–1.68) |
|
| Revascularization | 4.54 (3.63–5.68) | 1.93 (1.43–2.60) | 3.23 (2.43–4.30) | 3.64 (2.93–4.53) | 3.11 (2.32–4.16) |
| Smoking |
| 2.25 (1.50–3.38) | 1.42 (1.03–1.94) |
| 2.41 (1.60–3.64) |
| Exercise test results | |||||
| Peak heart rate | 0.87 (0.83–0.91) |
|
| 0.98 (0.97–0.99) |
|
| Peak systolic BP |
|
|
|
|
|
| Peak RPP | 0.96 (0.95–0.98) |
|
|
|
|
| Typical angina | 1.68 (1.30–2.18) |
|
|
|
|
| ST-segment changes |
|
|
|
|
|
| Scan parameters | |||||
| Abnormal scan | 1.68 (1.36–2.08) | – | 1.57 (1.12–2.20) | – | – |
| Reversible defect | 1.94 (1.55–2.44) | – | – | 1.62 (1.20–2.20) | – |
| Fixed defect | 1.28 (1.03–1.58) | – | – |
| |
| SRS** | 1.02 (1.01–1.02) | – | – | – | 1.03 (1.01–1.04) |
| SDS** | 1.05 (1.04–1.07) | – | – | – |
|
| SSS** | 1.27 (1.15–1.46) | – | – | – | – |
Statistically significant predictors of outcome are presented as hazard ratio (confidence interval), of all other variables the P value is presented.
–, Not included in the model; BP, blood pressure; RPP, rate pressure product; SSS, summed stress score; SRS, summed rest score; SDS, summed difference score.
* Per unit increment, ** per % myocardium increment.