Literature DB >> 25317027

Angina Relief by Ranolazine Identifies False-Negative SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Scans in Patients with Coronary Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Angiography.

Gary L Murray1.   

Abstract

Normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) reduces intermediate- or high-risk pretest probability patients to low- or intermediate-risk posttest probability, respectively, for coronary disease (CD). Since ranolazine (RAN) relieves only angina, anginal patients with normal MPI whose angina is relieved by RAN present a significant dilemma. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to confirm the impression that coronary angiography (CA) is indicated in patients whose class 3 to 4 angina is relieved by RAN, but have normal myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPIs. Charts of patients with stable class 3 to 4 angina (typical and atypical) and normal MPIs (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥50% and segmental score = 0) were reviewed. CA was done on all the patients with complete angina relief taking RAN, as well as nonresponders whose anginal etiology could not be explained. Stenoses were considered flow-restrictive when more than 70% diameter stenosis is observed by quantitative CA, or, when 50 to 70%, fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured ≤0.80. RAN relieved angina in 36 of 54 (67%) patients. Of the known cases, 25 of these 36 (69%) had 43 stenoses ≥50% (mean = 66%): 15 (60%) had 1 vessel disease; 9 (36%) had multivessel disease; 18 (72%) had left anterior descending (LAD) disease; 1 (4%) had left main disease. Twenty one of 43 (49%) stenosis were > 70%; 22 (51%) stenoses were 50 to 70% and required FFR measurement. Twenty nine of 43 stenoses (67%) were considered flow-restrictive in 18 of these 25 (72%) patients. Eight RAN nonresponders with no explanation for angina had no CD at CA. RAN angina relief is invaluable in identifying falsely negative SPECT MPI, and 50% of these patients have flow-restrictive stenoses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angina; cardiac catheterization; coronary disease; fractional flow reserve; myocardial SPECT perfusion; ranolazine

Year:  2014        PMID: 25317027      PMCID: PMC4169097          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1382290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  23 in total

Review 1.  Functional measurement of coronary stenosis.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Jan-Willem E M Sels
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Limitation of fractional flow reserve in evaluating coronary artery myocardial bridge.

Authors:  Inder M Singh; Roopa A Subbarao; Saihari Sadanandan
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.022

3.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease.

Authors:  G A Diamond; J S Forrester
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  [Cardiovascular end organ impairment due to hypertension].

Authors:  C M Schannwell; S Steiner; M G Hennersdorf; B E Strauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Gregory J Dehmer; John W Hirshfeld; Peter K Smith; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  [Myocardial perfusion tomography imaging in patients without prior myocardial infarction--comparison between 201Tl, 99mTc-tetrofosmin and dual-isotope protocol (rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc-tetrofosmin)].

Authors:  M Kamínek; M Myslivecek; M Skvarilová; V Husák; O Lang
Journal:  Vnitr Lek       Date:  1999-02

8.  Prognostic value of normal exercise and adenosine (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT imaging: results from the multicenter registry of 4,728 patients.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Robert Hendel; Salvador Borges-Neto; Michael S Lauer; Naomi Alazraki; Joy Burnette; Elizabeth Krawczynska; Manuel Cerqueira; Jamshid Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Evaluation of Tc-99m tetrofosmin scan for coronary artery disease diagnosis.

Authors:  Elie Chammas; Ahmad Yatim; Chadi Hage; Kozhaya Sokhn; Walid Tarcha; Georges Ghanem
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2002-09

10.  Transient integral boundary layer method to calculate the translesional pressure drop and the fractional flow reserve in myocardial bridges.

Authors:  Stefan Bernhard; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Andreas Tilgner
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.