Literature DB >> 16641702

Breast cancer local recurrence after mastectomy and TRAM flap reconstruction: incidence and treatment options.

Michael A Howard1, Kristen Polo, Andrea L Pusic, Peter G Cordeiro, David A Hidalgo, Babak Mehrara, Joseph J Disa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is the standard in autologous breast reconstruction. The management of local recurrence of breast cancer after TRAM flap breast reconstruction has not been well described. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of local recurrence of breast cancer after TRAM flap breast reconstruction, evaluate treatment modalities, and determine outcomes in such cases.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a free or pedicled TRAM flap over a 15-year period. Those patients who experienced local breast cancer recurrence were identified. A subset of complete skin-sparing mastectomy patients was also identified for review.
RESULTS: From 1987 to 2002, 419 TRAM flap breast reconstructions were performed in 395 patients. Thirty-four (9 percent) were complete skin-sparing mastectomy using a periareolar mastectomy incision only. The mean follow-up time in this study was 4.9 years (range, 1 to 14.7 years). Local recurrence occurred in 16 of 419 patients (3.8 percent), with a mean time to local recurrence of 1.6 years (range, 0.2 to 7.0 years). There were no local recurrences seen in patients following complete skin-sparing mastectomy. Treatment of local recurrence included excision, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and bone marrow transplant. Only three of the 16 patients (19 percent) required removal of the entire TRAM flap to manage local breast cancer recurrence. Nine of 16 patients (56 percent) with local recurrence died of disease at a mean of 1.2 years after the development of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up demonstrated a local recurrence rate after TRAM flap breast reconstruction similar to that reported in the literature. Local recurrence was effectively managed with surgical excision of the involved tissues, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy. Removal of the entire TRAM flap was only necessary in the setting of multifocal recurrence or involvement of the flap pedicle with disease. The risk of local recurrence was not increased following complete skin-sparing mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16641702     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000208116.86765.4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  19 in total

1.  A single institution experience with skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Doddi; T Singhal; A Kasem; A Desai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Local recurrence of breast cancer in reconstructed breasts using TRAM flap after skin-sparing mastectomy: clinical and imaging features.

Authors:  Hyunkyung Yoo; Bo Hyun Kim; Hak Hee Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Taik Jong Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Should Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction Be Considered in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy? A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Billig; Reshma Jagsi; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edward Buchel; Edwin G Wilkins; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Outcome of management of local recurrence after immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Taik Jong Lee; Wu Jin Hur; Eun Key Kim; Sei Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

Review 5.  Multimodality Imaging of the Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Beatriz E Adrada; Gary J Whitman; Melissa A Crosby; Selin Carkaci; Mark J Dryden; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2015-04-27

6.  Does Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy affect the Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Jeonghui Lee; Se Kyung Lee; Sangmin Kim; Min Young Koo; Min-Young Choi; Soo Youn Bae; Dong Hui Cho; Jiyoung Kim; Seung Pil Jung; Jun-Ho Choe; Jung-Han Kim; Jee Soo Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Jung-Hyun Yang; Seok Jin Nam
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Breast Reconstruction Surgery and Therapeutic Mammoplasty: Prospective Evaluation 1 Year Post-Surgery with BREAST-Q Questionnaire.

Authors:  Laxmi Shekhawat; Laleh Busheri; Santosh Dixit; Chaula Patel; Upendra Dhar; Chaitanyanand Koppiker
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-23

Review 8.  Patients opting for breast reconstruction following mastectomy: an analysis of uptake rates and benefit.

Authors:  Marissa M Howard-McNatt
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2013-02-25

9.  Mastectomies on the rise for breast cancer: "the tide is changing".

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Sequelae of fat grafting postmastectomy: an algorithm for management of fat necrosis.

Authors:  Erin L Doren; Rajiv P Parikh; Christine Laronga; Matthew E Hiro; Weihong Sun; Marie Catherine Lee; Paul D Smith; William J Fulp
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.