Literature DB >> 25423892

Distinct anatomical correlates of discriminability and criterion setting in verbal recognition memory revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.

J Matthijs Biesbroek1, Martine J E van Zandvoort, L Jaap Kappelle, Linda Schoo, Hugo J Kuijf, Birgitta K Velthuis, Geert Jan Biessels, Albert Postma.   

Abstract

Recognition memory, that is, the ability to judge whether an item has been previously encountered in a particular context, depends on two factors: discriminability and criterion setting. Discriminability draws on memory processes while criterion setting (i.e., the application of a threshold resulting in a yes/no response) is regarded as a process of cognitive control. Discriminability and criterion setting are assumed to draw on distinct anatomical structures, but definite evidence for this assumption is lacking. We applied voxel-based and region of interest-based lesion-symptom mapping to 83 patients in the acute phase of ischemic stroke to determine the anatomical correlates of discriminability and criterion setting in verbal recognition memory. Recognition memory was measured with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Signal-detection theory was used to calculate measures for discriminability and criterion setting. Lesion-symptom mapping revealed that discriminability draws on left medial temporal and temporo-occipital structures, both thalami and the right hippocampus, while criterion setting draws on the right inferior frontal gyrus. Lesions in the right inferior frontal gyrus were associated with liberal response bias. These findings indicate that discriminability and criterion setting indeed depend on distinct anatomical structures and provide new insights in the anatomical correlates of these cognitive processes that underlie verbal recognition memory.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  criterion setting; discriminability; lesion-symptom mapping; recognition memory; response bias

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25423892      PMCID: PMC6869440          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  38 in total

1.  The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests.

Authors:  Gail Robinson; Tim Shallice; Marco Bozzali; Lisa Cipolotti
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Measuring recognition memory.

Authors:  W Donaldson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-09

3.  Rey's verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24-81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation.

Authors:  Wim Van der Elst; Martin P J van Boxtel; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Jelle Jolles
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Power in Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Daniel Y Kimberg; H Branch Coslett; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Keelin Murphy; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Pathological false alarm rates following damage to the left frontal cortex.

Authors:  A J Parkin; C Bindschaedler; L Harsent; C Metzler
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age?

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  The posterior parietal cortex in recognition memory: a neuropsychological study.

Authors:  Sharon Haramati; Nachum Soroker; Yadin Dudai; Daniel A Levy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Association between subcortical vascular lesion location and cognition: a voxel-based and tract-based lesion-symptom mapping study. The SMART-MR study.

Authors:  J Matthijs Biesbroek; Hugo J Kuijf; Yolanda van der Graaf; Koen L Vincken; Albert Postma; Willem P T M Mali; Geert J Biessels; Mirjam I Geerlings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped.

Authors:  Yee-Haur Mah; Masud Husain; Geraint Rees; Parashkev Nachev
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neural correlates of verbal memory in youth with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.

Authors:  Lauren A Gross; Eileen M Moore; Jeffrey R Wozniak; Claire D Coles; Julie A Kable; Elizabeth R Sowell; Kenneth L Jones; Edward P Riley; Sarah N Mattson
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Strategic infarct location for post-stroke cognitive impairment: A multivariate lesion-symptom mapping study.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; J Matthijs Biesbroek; Lin Shi; Wenyan Liu; Hugo J Kuijf; Winnie Wc Chu; Jill M Abrigo; Ryan Kl Lee; Thomas Wh Leung; Alexander Yl Lau; Geert J Biessels; Vincent Mok; Adrian Wong
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Are visual working memory and episodic memory distinct processes? Insight from stroke patients by lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Selma Lugtmeijer; Linda Geerligs; Frank Erik de Leeuw; Edward H F de Haan; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Regional structural impairments outside lesions are associated with verbal short-term memory deficits in chronic subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Qingqing Diao; Jingchun Liu; Caihong Wang; Jingliang Cheng; Tong Han; Xuejun Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

5.  The Additional Contribution of White Matter Hyperintensity Location to Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment: Insights From a Multiple-Lesion Symptom Mapping Study.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Adrian Wong; Yishan Luo; Wenyan Liu; Winnie W C Chu; Jill M Abrigo; Ryan K L Lee; Vincent Mok; Lin Shi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Failure to Affect Decision Criteria During Recognition Memory With Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.

Authors:  Evan Layher; Tyler Santander; Lukas J Volz; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.