Literature DB >> 22871639

Biocompatibility and chemical reaction kinetics of injectable, settable polyurethane/allograft bone biocomposites.

Jonathan M Page1, Edna M Prieto, Jerald E Dumas, Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz, Joseph C Wenke, Pamela Brown-Baer, Scott A Guelcher.   

Abstract

Injectable and settable bone grafts offer significant advantages over pre-formed implants due to their ability to be administered using minimally invasive techniques and to conform to the shape of the defect. However, injectable biomaterials present biocompatibility challenges due to the potential toxicity and ultimate fate of reactive components that are not incorporated in the final cured product. In this study the effects of stoichiometry and triethylenediamine (TEDA) catalyst concentration on the reactivity, injectability, and biocompatibility of two component lysine-derived polyurethane (PUR) biocomposites were investigated. Rate constants were measured for the reactions of water (a blowing agent resulting in the generation of pores), polyester triol, dipropylene glycol (DPG), and allograft bone particles with the isocyanate-terminated prepolymer using an in situ attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy technique. Based on the measured rate constants, a kinetic model predicting the conversion of each component with time was developed. Despite the fact that TEDA is a well-known urethane gelling catalyst, it was found to preferentially catalyze the blowing reaction with water relative to the gelling reactions by a ratio >17:1. Thus the kinetic model predicted that the prepolymer and water proceeded to full conversion, while the conversions of polyester triol and DPG were <70% after 24h, which was consistent with leaching experiments showing that only non-cytotoxic polyester triol and DPG were released from the reactive PUR at early time points. The PUR biocomposite supported cellular infiltration and remodeling in femoral condyle defects in rabbits at 8weeks, and there was no evidence of an adverse inflammatory response induced by unreacted components from the biocomposite or degradation products from the cured polymer. Taken together, these data underscore the utility of the kinetic model in predicting the biocompatibility of reactive biomaterials.
Copyright © 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22871639     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  15 in total

1.  Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Stefanie M Shiels; Lauren A Boller; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Craig L Duvall; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  A transient cell-shielding method for viable MSC delivery within hydrophobic scaffolds polymerized in situ.

Authors:  Ruijing Guo; Catherine L Ward; Jeffrey M Davidson; Craig L Duvall; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Injectable foams for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Edna M Prieto; Jonathan M Page; Andrew J Harmata; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11

Review 4.  25th anniversary article: Rational design and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Nasim Annabi; Ali Tamayol; Jorge Alfredo Uquillas; Mohsen Akbari; Luiz E Bertassoni; Chaenyung Cha; Gulden Camci-Unal; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Nicholas A Peppas; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Effects of particle size and porosity on in vivo remodeling of settable allograft bone/polymer composites.

Authors:  Edna M Prieto; Anne D Talley; Nicholas R Gould; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Susan J Drapeau; Kerem N Kalpakci; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Oxidatively Degradable Poly(thioketal urethane)/Ceramic Composite Bone Cements with Bone-Like Strength.

Authors:  Madison A P McEnery; Sichang Lu; Mukesh K Gupta; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Joseph C Wenke; Kerem N Kalpakci; Daniel Shimko; Craig L Duvall; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.361

7.  Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite-poly(thioketal urethane) nanocomposites stimulate a combined intramembranous and endochondral ossification response in rabbits.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Lauren A Boller; Dustin M Groff; Jonathan G Schoenecker; Jeffry S Nyman; Joseph C Wenke; Cheyenne Rhodes; Dan Shimko; Craig L Duvall; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-12-10

8.  Investigating the Effects of Surface-Initiated Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone to Bioactive Glass Particles on the Mechanical Properties of Settable Polymer/Ceramic Composites.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Catherine L Ward; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.089

9.  A porous tissue engineering scaffold selectively degraded by cell-generated reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  John R Martin; Mukesh K Gupta; Jonathan M Page; Fang Yu; Jeffrey M Davidson; Scott A Guelcher; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Resorbable Nanocomposites with Bone-Like Strength and Enhanced Cellular Activity.

Authors:  S Lu; M A P McEnery; B R Rogers; J C Wenke; D Shimko; S A Guelcher
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.