Literature DB >> 12763410

Institutional variations in the management of patients with acute appendicitis.

Jennefer A Kieran1, Myriam J Curet2, Carol R Schermer1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate institutional differences in preoperative workup, operative approach, complications, and cost in patients with acute appendicitis. A retrospective chart review was performed of all adults operated on for acute appendicitis from June 1999 to November 2000 at the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) and Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC). Variables compared included age, race, sex, duration of symptoms, type of symptoms, results of radiographic evaluation, time from emergency room to operating room, operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic), operative time, length of hospital stay, pathologic findings, and complications. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Fisher's exact test. A total of 154 appendectomies were performed for acute appendicitis at UNMH and 165 at SUMC. Statistically significant differences were found at UNMH vs. SUMC in time from emergency room to operating room (9.1 hours vs. 13.7 hours; P<0.001), operative approach (48% laparoscopic vs. 29% open; P<0.001), and negative appendectomy rate (13% vs. 4.8%; P<0.001). There were no differences in the perforation rate or other complications. Cost analysis showed that $56,744 more was spent at UNMH for the additional negative appendectomy operations, whereas $99,842 more was spent at SUMC for the additional CT scans. Institutional differences in the management of patients with acute appendicitis can result in significant differences in cost without clinically significant differences in outcome. The use of clinical examination and laparoscopy as diagnostic modalities instead of CT scanning resulted in a more cost-effective approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12763410     DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

Review 1.  Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years.

Authors:  P F Jones
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance.

Authors:  V Velanovich; R Satava
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board.

Authors:  B F Wall; D Hart
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.

Authors:  G P McDonald; D P Pendarvis; R Wilmoth; B J Daley
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  D L Stroman; C V Bayouth; J A Kuhn; M Westmoreland; R C Jones; T L Fisher; T M McCarty
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M J Weyant; S R Eachempati; M A Maluccio; D E Rivadeneira; S R Grobmyer; L J Hydo; P S Barie
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  S Sauerland; R Lefering; E A Neugebauer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

9.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S L Lee; A J Walsh; H S Ho
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-05

10.  A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses.

Authors:  K H Long; M P Bannon; S P Zietlow; E R Helgeson; W S Harmsen; C D Smith; D M Ilstrup; Y Baerga-Varela; M G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  3 in total

1.  Current trends in the management of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S Ng; F J Fleming; J Drumm; D Waldron; P A Grace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Validation and refinement of a prediction rule to identify children at low risk for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Michelle D Stevenson; Charles G Macias; Manoj K Mittal; Richard G Bachur; Jonathan E Bennett; Kelly Sinclair; Craig Huang; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-08

3.  [Appendix abscess: analysis of 19 cases treated at University Hospital of Yaounde and practical deductions ].

Authors:  Marc Leroy Guifo; Samuel Takongmo; Alain Chichom; Christopher Tagnyin Pisoh; Faustin Tsatedem Atemkeng; Markus Fokou
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-07-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.