| Literature DB >> 22869378 |
Louic S Vermeer1, Yun Lan, Vincenzo Abbate, Emrah Ruh, Tam T Bui, Louise J Wilkinson, Tokuwa Kanno, Elmira Jumagulova, Justyna Kozlowska, Jayneil Patel, Caitlin A McIntyre, W C Yam, Gilman Siu, R Andrew Atkinson, Jenny K W Lam, Sukhvinder S Bansal, Alex F Drake, Graham H Mitchell, A James Mason.
Abstract
We used a combination of fluorescence, circular dichroism (CD), and NMR spectroscopies in conjunction with size exclusion chromatography to help rationalize the relative antibacterial, antiplasmodial, and cytotoxic activities of a series of proline-free and proline-containing model antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in terms of their structural properties. When compared with proline-free analogs, proline-containing peptides had greater activity against Gram-negative bacteria, two mammalian cancer cell lines, and intraerythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum, which they were capable of killing without causing hemolysis. In contrast, incorporation of proline did not have a consistent effect on peptide activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In membrane-mimicking environments, structures with high α-helix content were adopted by both proline-free and proline-containing peptides. In solution, AMPs generally adopted disordered structures unless their sequences comprised more hydrophobic amino acids or until coordinating phosphate ions were added. Proline-containing peptides resisted ordering induced by either method. The roles of the angle subtended by positively charged amino acids and the positioning of the proline residues were also investigated. Careful positioning of proline residues in AMP sequences is required to enable the peptide to resist ordering and maintain optimal antibacterial activity, whereas varying the angle subtended by positively charged amino acids can attenuate hemolytic potential albeit with a modest reduction in potency. Maintaining conformational flexibility improves AMP potency and selectivity toward bacterial, plasmodial, and cancerous cells while enabling the targeting of intracellular pathogens.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22869378 PMCID: PMC3464521 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.359067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Chem ISSN: 0021-9258 Impact factor: 5.157
Comparison of physical features of peptides used in this study
Hydrophobicity (H) and mean hydrophobic moment (μH) are shown according to the combined consensus scale or Eisenberg scale and were calculated using the HydroMCalc Java applet made available by Alex Tossi. All peptides contain eight lysine residues and are amidated at the C terminus, which confers a nominal charge of +9 at neutral pH. d-Amino acid residues are shown in italics. Significant changes to the sequences are highlighted: histidine, phenylalanine, and proline residues are highlighted in bold with proline also underlined.
| Peptide | Sequence | μ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.26 | −0.05 | 1.28 | ||
| 0.87 | −0.07 | 1.66 | ||
| −0.08 | 2.28 | |||
| 0.00 | −0.10 | 2.25 | ||
| −0.16 | 2.80 | |||
| −0.17 | 3.81 | |||
| −0.17 | 4.02 | |||
| −0.17 | 3.40 | |||
| LAK80 | KKLAKALKLLALLWLKLAKALKKA-NH2 | 0.46 | −0.09 | 3.73 |
| LAK80-P7 | KKLAKA | 0.05 | −0.11 | 3.46 |
| LAK80-P10 | KKLAKALKL | 0.05 | −0.11 | 3.33 |
| LAK80-P12 | KKLAKALKLLA | 0.05 | −0.11 | 4.14 |
| LAK120 | KKLALALKKLALLWKKLALALKKA-NH2 | 0.46 | −0.09 | 3.02 |
| LAK120-P7 | KKLALA | 0.05 | −0.11 | 2.76 |
| LAK120-P10 | KKLALALKK | 0.05 | −0.11 | 2.62 |
| LAK120-P12 | KKLALALKKLA | 0.05 | −0.11 | 3.43 |
| LAK160 | KKLKLALAKLALLWKALALKLKKA-NH2 | 0.46 | −0.09 | 2.59 |
| LAK160-P7 | KKLKLA | 0.05 | −0.11 | 2.34 |
| LAK160-P10 | KKLKLALAK | 0.05 | −0.11 | 2.18 |
| LAK160-P12 | KKLKLALAKLA | 0.05 | −0.11 | 3.00 |
| LAK80-F1 | 0.41 | −0.06 | 3.36 | |
| LAK80-F2 | 0.78 | −0.04 | 3.55 | |
| LAK80-F2-P9 | 0.40 | −0.06 | 3.30 |
Combined consensus scale.
Eisenberg scale.
Mean hydrophobic moment assuming formation of ideal α-helix.
Comparison of MIC
Results are an average of two or more independently repeated experiments. HC50 values greater than 10 times the EC50 for antiplasmodial activity for either strain are highlighted in bold. ND, not determined.
| Peptide | MIC50 | EC50 | Hemolysis, HC50 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | RAW264.7 | |||||||
| 1.48 ± 0.53 | 2.71 ± 1.07 | 0.62 ± 0.15 | 1.95 ± 0.08 | ND | ND | ND | 4.06 ± 1.30 | |
| 1.54 ± 0.97 | 1.42 ± 0.41 | 0.58 ± 0.18 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 2.18 ± 0.41 | 2.44 ± 0.43 | 3.80 ± 0.34 | 11.66 ± 0.03 | |
| 1.23 ± 0.47 | 1.83 ± 0.63 | 0.38 ± 0.21 | 1.45 ± 0.12 | 2.13 ± 0.14 | 5.23 ± 0.35 | 7.31 ± 2.13 | 17.42 ± 2.17 | |
| 1.08 ± 0.62 | 1.22 ± 0.19 | 0.29 ± 0.09 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 2.36 ± 0.10 | 3.11 ± 0.57 | 3.42 ± 0.16 | ||
| 1.54 ± 0.01 | 1.35 ± 0.07 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 1.26 ± 0.14 | 4.43 ± 0.33 | 4.54 ± 0.30 | 5.21 ± 0.57 | 20.29 ± 2.42 | |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | 2.88 ± 0.25 | 2.21 ± 0.63 | 2.33 ± 0.30 | ||
| ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.96 ± 0.07 | 6.50 ± 0.37 | 7.08 ± 1.42 | 8.61 ± 0.35 | |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | 3.94 ± 0.33 | 7.58 ± 0.42 | 3.95 ± 0.40 | ||
FIGURE 1.The ability of eight -LAK peptides to inhibit the growth of When histidine-free peptides are compared (A), a reduction of antibacterial activity is observed when proline is incorporated. For histidine-containing peptides (B), incorporation of proline increases antibacterial activity. Altering the angle subtended by the lysine residues to either 80° or 160° diminishes peptide potency.
FIGURE 2.Shown are circular dichroism spectra of d-LAK120-A (A) in 5 mm Tris buffer solution, pH 7. 3 titrated with increasing concentrations of phosphate buffer at 37 °C. The changes in left-handed α-helix content as monitored by the ellipticity at 220 nm are shown as a function of phosphate concentration (B) and compared with corresponding experiments performed with a further four peptides. The shift in the tryptophan emission maximum (C) and the retention times on a size exclusion column (D) were also evaluated as a function of phosphate concentration and are related to the buildup of secondary structure. Lines are to guide the eye. deg, degrees. Error bars are the standard deviation of two independently repeated experiments.
FIGURE 3.Circular dichroism spectra reveal the effect of peptide hydrophobicity and proline position on secondary structure in aqueous solution and membrane-mimicking medium. CD spectra are shown for LAK80, LAK80-F1, LAK80-F2, and LAK80-F2-P9 in 5 mm Tris buffer solution (A) or dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine/dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol (75:25) liposomes (B) and LAK160, LAK160-P7, LAK160-P10, and LAK160-P12 in 50 mm SDS (C) or dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine/dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol (75:25) liposomes (D). All spectra were recorded at 37 °C. deg, degrees.
Comparison of MIC
Results are an average of two or more independently repeated experiments. ND, not determined. Proline-free template peptides are indicated in bold.
| Peptide | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ND | ND | ||
| LAK80-P7 | 2.97 ± 0.15 | 2.13 ± 0.77 | 1.26 ± 0.49 |
| LAK80-P10 | 1.62 ± 0.17 | 1.18 ± 0.53 | 0.82 ± 0.03 |
| LAK80-P12 | 1.80 ± 0.27 | 0.86 ± 0.09 | 0.80 ± 0.01 |
| LAK120-P7 | 0.80 ± 0.03 | 4.45 ± 0.19 | 0.45 ± 0.10 |
| LAK120-P10 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 9.16 ± 1.43 | 0.47 ± 0.15 |
| LAK120-P12 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 2.14 ± 0.53 | 0.68 ± 0.14 |
| LAK160-P7 | 0.79 ± 0.41 | 2.98 ± 0.21 | 0.46 ± 0.11 |
| LAK160-P10 | 2.22 ± 0.63 | 4.14 ± 0.23 | 0.45 ± 0.24 |
| LAK160-P12 | 0.48 ± 0.20 | 1.69 ± 0.09 | 0.38 ± 0.08 |
FIGURE 4.Shown is the superimposition of backbone atoms in each of the 10 lowest energy structures for LAK160-P7 (A and B), LAK160-P10 (C and D), and LAK160-P12 (E and F) fitted to either region 1 (A, C, and E) or region 2 (B, D, and F). Proline residues are shown in red. Also shown is a schematic representation of the 10 lowest energy structures where residues that are α-helical in more than eight structures are shown as solid boxes, and those that are α-helical in seven or fewer structures are shown as a line (G). Proline residues are again marked in red.