| Literature DB >> 22868871 |
Dag Helge Frøisland1, Eirik Arsand, Finn Skårderud.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only 17% of Norwegian children and adolescents with diabetes achieve international treatment goals measured by glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)). Classic patient-physician consultations seem to be poorly adapted to young children. New strategies that are better attuned to young people to improve support of adolescents' self-management of diabetes need to be tested and evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22868871 PMCID: PMC3803161 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Internet Res ISSN: 1438-8871 Impact factor: 5.428
Figure 1The first step in the Diamob application, consisting of pictograms specifying planned physical activity. This leads the user to the next step.
Figure 2The Bluetooth transmitter (left) sends glucose measurements to the phone as soon as the test strip is extracted from the glucometer.
Figure 3Example of a picture produced by the Diamob application. Pictures were available for users to browse through on the phone and could also be uploaded to computers and used during consultations.
Brief overview of the process of analyzing the interviews.
| Theme | Codes and | Category and | Findings and hypothesis |
| Functionality of mobile phone diary | To see the coherence of treatment | Visualization | Diamob seems to be more an educational tool to enhance understanding of diabetes self-care than just a communication tool. This might be due to brain development among children and adolescents, and because practical executive competence is facilitated by visual memory rather than theoretical facts. |
| SMSa
| Closeness | Access | SMS is a useful and preferred tool for adolescents to enhance contact with the health care system, and a nonencrypted version is favored. |
| Technical advice and challenges | Technical challenges | Software changes | Changes to the two applications need to be made to increase functionality. |
a Short message service.
Participants’ glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and knowledge test score (maximum score 27), before and after the intervention, and System Usability Scale (SUS) score (maximum score 100) after the intervention.
| Participant | HbA1c % | Knowledge test score | SUS score | ||
| Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Jan | 8.6 | 9.0 | 18 | 20 | 67.5 |
| David | 6.6 | 6.4 | 22 | 21 | 87.5 |
| Eva | 8.6 | 7.6 | 11 | NAa | 30 |
| Beth | 8.3 | 8.3 | 23 | 23 | 87.5 |
| Kristin | 8.0 | 8.4 | 21 | 22 | 65 |
| Oda | 7.4 | 7.2 | 23 | 23 | 87.5 |
| Tom | 9.4 | 9.1 | 21 | 24 | 30 |
| Erik | 9.2 | 8.3 | 23 | 24 | 92.5 |
| Ann | 8.6 | 8.6 | 23 | 27 | 80 |
| Emma | 7.1 | 7.0 | 25 | 21 | 95 |
| Ingrid | 8.9 | 8.5 | 18 | 18 | 75 |
| Trondb | 9.0 | 9.7 | 24 | 20 | 77.5 |
a Eva did not take the postintervention knowledge test, and this is marked as not available.
b Trond did not complete the whole intervention for personal reasons unrelated to the study and was interviewed at the end.
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values, knowledge test scores, and System Usability Scale score before and after the intervention.
| Measure | Mean | SD | No. |
| |
|
| .38 | ||||
| Before | 8.3 | 0.9 | 12 | ||
| After | 8.1 | 0.9 | 12 | ||
|
| .82 | ||||
| Before | 22.0 | 2.3 | 12 | ||
| After | 22.1 | 2.5 | 11 | ||
|
| |||||
| All participants | 73.0 | 22.1 | 12 | ||
| High scorersa | 81.5 | 10.2 | 10 | ||
a Mean score excluding the 2 participants who scored low on the System Usability Scale (score of 30).