OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the evaluation of preparations from general dental practitioners for zirconia crowns and their correlation with clinical recommendations using a digital approach. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Seventy-five datasets of left first upper molars (FDI 16) prepared for single zirconia crowns by general dental practitioners were analyzed using a computer-aided design software (LAVA(TM) Design; 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and a 3D-inspection software (COMETinspect®plus version 4.5; Steinbichler Optotechnik, Neubeuern, Germany). Evaluated parameters were convergence angle, undercuts, interocclusal reduction, abutment height, and design of preparation margin. RESULTS: The mean convergence angle was determined to be 26.7°. The convergence angle in the mesiobuccal to distopalatal dimension was significantly the highest (31.7°), and the abutment height showed a mean value of 4.1 mm. Convergence angle and abutment height showed a negative correlation. Seventy-three percent of the evaluated locations revealed a margin design conforming to ceramic restorations. In over 30 % of the cases, the interocclusal reduction was insufficient. Generally, no preparation fulfilled all recommendations. Five (6.66 %) of the preparations fulfilled four criteria, 16 (21.33 %) preparations fulfilled three criteria, 31 (41.33 %) fulfilled two criteria, 17 (22.66 %) preparations fulfilled one criterion, and 6 (8 %) fulfilled no criterion. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, most general dental practitioners seem to have difficulties fulfilling all clinical recommendations given for the preparation of zirconia crowns. The presented digital approach seems to be a useful method to evaluate the preparation geometry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The correct preparation geometry represents an important prerequisite for the success of all-ceramic full crowns. As preparations clearly need to be improved, the approach presented could be the basis of a future tool to increase preparation quality in practice and education by direct objective feedback.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the evaluation of preparations from general dental practitioners for zirconia crowns and their correlation with clinical recommendations using a digital approach. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Seventy-five datasets of left first upper molars (FDI 16) prepared for single zirconia crowns by general dental practitioners were analyzed using a computer-aided design software (LAVA(TM) Design; 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and a 3D-inspection software (COMETinspect®plus version 4.5; Steinbichler Optotechnik, Neubeuern, Germany). Evaluated parameters were convergence angle, undercuts, interocclusal reduction, abutment height, and design of preparation margin. RESULTS: The mean convergence angle was determined to be 26.7°. The convergence angle in the mesiobuccal to distopalatal dimension was significantly the highest (31.7°), and the abutment height showed a mean value of 4.1 mm. Convergence angle and abutment height showed a negative correlation. Seventy-three percent of the evaluated locations revealed a margin design conforming to ceramic restorations. In over 30 % of the cases, the interocclusal reduction was insufficient. Generally, no preparation fulfilled all recommendations. Five (6.66 %) of the preparations fulfilled four criteria, 16 (21.33 %) preparations fulfilled three criteria, 31 (41.33 %) fulfilled two criteria, 17 (22.66 %) preparations fulfilled one criterion, and 6 (8 %) fulfilled no criterion. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, most general dental practitioners seem to have difficulties fulfilling all clinical recommendations given for the preparation of zirconia crowns. The presented digital approach seems to be a useful method to evaluate the preparation geometry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The correct preparation geometry represents an important prerequisite for the success of all-ceramic full crowns. As preparations clearly need to be improved, the approach presented could be the basis of a future tool to increase preparation quality in practice and education by direct objective feedback.
Authors: Paulo G Coelho; Nelson R Silva; Van P Thompson; Dianne Rekow; Guangming Zhang Journal: Int J Prosthodont Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.681
Authors: A Annerstedt; U Engström; A Hansson; T Jansson; S Karlsson; H Liljhagen; E Lindquist; E Rydhammar; M Tyreman-Bandhede; P Svensson; U Wandel Journal: Acta Odontol Scand Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 2.331