Literature DB >> 22867768

The clinical and economic burden of poor adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications in Ireland.

Mickaël Hiligsmann1, Bernie McGowan, Kathleen Bennett, Michael Barry, Jean-Yves Reginster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Medication nonadherence is common for osteoporosis, but its consequences have not been well described. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic impacts of poor adherence and to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of improving patient adherence by using hypothetical behavioral interventions.
METHODS: A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was adapted to the Irish setting to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes (fractures and quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) for three adherence scenarios: no treatment, real-world adherence, and full adherence over 3 years. The real-world scenario employed adherence and persistence data from the Irish Health Services Executive-Primary Care Reimbursement Services pharmacy claims database. We also investigated the cost-effectiveness of hypothetical behavioral interventions to improve medication adherence (according to their cost and effect on adherence).
RESULTS: The number of fractures prevented and the QALY gain obtained at real-world adherence levels represented only 57% and 56% of those expected with full adherence, respectively. The costs per QALY gained of real-world adherence and of full adherence compared with no treatment were estimated at € 11,834 and € 6,341, respectively. An intervention to improve adherence by 25% would result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of € 11,511 per QALY and € 54,182 per QALY, compared with real-world adherence, if the intervention cost an additional € 50 and € 100 per year, respectively. DISCUSSION: Poor adherence with osteoporosis medications results in around a 50% reduction in the potential benefits observed in clinical trials and a doubling of the cost per QALY gained from these medications. Depending on their costs and outcomes, programs to improve adherence have the potential to be an efficient use of resources.
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22867768     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  25 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; M Salas; D A Hughes; E Manias; F H Gwadry-Sridhar; P Linck; W Cowell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of interventions for osteoporosis: issues to consider.

Authors:  Matt D Stevenson; Peter L Selby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Potential cost-effectiveness for using patient decision aids to guide osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  H Penton; M Hiligsmann; M Harrison; J-Y Reginster; A Boonen; N Bansback
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Bone care nurses and the evolution of the nurse's educational function: the Guardian Angel(®) research project.

Authors:  Rosaria Alvaro; Annalisa Pennini; Emanuela Basilici Zannetti; Noemi Cittadini; Maurizio Feola; Cecilia Rao; Fabio D'Agostino; Ercole Vellone; Umberto Tarantino
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

Review 5.  A systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Patients' preferences for anti-osteoporosis drug treatment: a cross-European discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Benedict G Dellaert; Carmen D Dirksen; Verity Watson; Sandrine Bours; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Yves Reginster; Christian Roux; Bernie McGowan; Carmel Silke; Bryan Whelan; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Elisa Torres; Georgios Papadakis; Rene Rizzoli; Cyrus Cooper; Gill Pearson; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Insufficient persistence to pharmacotherapy in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: an analysis of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups in Japan.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakatoh; Kenji Fujimori; Shigeyuki Ishii; Junko Tamaki; Nobukazu Okimoto; Sumito Ogawa; Masayuki Iki
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Comparison of prescribing and adherence patterns of anti-osteoporotic medications post-admission for fragility type fracture in an urban teaching hospital and a rural teaching hospital in Ireland between 2005 and 2008.

Authors:  B McGowan; K Bennett; M C Casey; J Doherty; C Silke; B Whelan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  Management of osteoporosis of the oldest old.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; J Branco; M-L Brandi; S Boonen; O Bruyère; P Cacoub; C Cooper; A Diez-Perez; J Duder; R A Fielding; N C Harvey; M Hiligsmann; J A Kanis; J Petermans; J D Ringe; Y Tsouderos; J Weinman; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Health technology assessment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickael Hiligsmann; John A Kanis; Juliet Compston; Cyrus Cooper; Bruno Flamion; Pierre Bergmann; Jean-Jacques Body; Steven Boonen; Olivier Bruyere; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.