Literature DB >> 24715605

Modelling the cost effectiveness of interventions for osteoporosis: issues to consider.

Matt D Stevenson1, Peter L Selby.   

Abstract

Expenditure on treating osteoporotic fractures and on preventative intervention is considerable and is likely to rise in forthcoming years due to the association between fracture risk and age. With funders such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee explicitly considering cost-effectiveness analyses within the process of producing guidance, it is imperative that economic models are as robust as possible. This article details issues that need to be considered specifically related to health technology assessments of interventions for osteoporosis, and highlights limitations within the current evidence base. A likely direction of impact on cost effectiveness of addressing the key issues has been included alongside a tentative categorization of the level of these impacts. It is likely that cost-effectiveness ratios presented in previous models that did not address the identified issues were favourable to interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24715605     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0156-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  43 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J E Brazier; M Stevenson; N W Calvert; M Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.

Authors:  Karl Claxton; Mark Sculpher; Chris McCabe; Andrew Briggs; Ron Akehurst; Martin Buxton; John Brazier; Tony O'Hagan
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  H E Meyer; A Tverdal; J A Falch; J I Pedersen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Niklas Zethraeus; Olof Johnell; Lars Lidgren; Sari Ponzer; Olle Svensson; Peter Abdon; Ewald Ornstein; Karl Lunsjö; Karl Göran Thorngren; Ingemar Sernbo; Clas Rehnberg; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Excess mortality after hospitalisation for vertebral fracture.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shane; David Burr; Bo Abrahamsen; Robert A Adler; Thomas D Brown; Angela M Cheung; Felicia Cosman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Richard Dell; David W Dempster; Peter R Ebeling; Thomas A Einhorn; Harry K Genant; Piet Geusens; Klaus Klaushofer; Joseph M Lane; Fergus McKiernan; Ross McKinney; Alvin Ng; Jeri Nieves; Regis O'Keefe; Socrates Papapoulos; Tet Sen Howe; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Robert S Weinstein; Michael P Whyte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Determinants of reduced survival following hip fractures in men.

Authors:  G Poór; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Stevenson; S Davis; M Lloyd-Jones; C Beverley
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Gaussian process modeling in conjunction with individual patient simulation modeling: a case study describing the calculation of cost-effectiveness ratios for the treatment of established osteoporosis.

Authors:  M D Stevenson; J Oakley; J B Chilcott
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  5 in total

1.  Health state utility values and patient-reported outcomes before and after vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in an osteoporosis clinical trial.

Authors:  T Imai; S Tanaka; K Kawakami; T Miyazaki; H Hagino; M Shiraki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Silvia M Evers; Wafa Ben Sedrine; John A Kanis; Bram Ramaekers; Jean-Yves Reginster; Stuart Silverman; Caroline E Wyers; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Chronic joint pain and handgrip strength correlates with osteoporosis in mid-life women: a Singaporean cohort.

Authors:  S Logan; W P P Thu; W K Lay; L Y Wang; J A Cauley; E L Yong
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Zoledronic Acid Versus Oral Alendronate for Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women in China.

Authors:  Ruxu You; Yu Zhang; David Bin-Chia Wu; Jinyu Liu; Xinyu Qian; Nan Luo; Takahiro Mori
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Economic Evaluation of Oral Alendronate Therapy for Osteoporosis in Chinese Postmenopausal Women: The Impact of Medication Compliance and Persistence.

Authors:  Ruxu You; Zijie Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.