Literature DB >> 22865706

Absolute risk regression for competing risks: interpretation, link functions, and prediction.

Thomas A Gerds1, Thomas H Scheike, Per K Andersen.   

Abstract

In survival analysis with competing risks, the transformation model allows different functions between the outcome and explanatory variables. However, the model's prediction accuracy and the interpretation of parameters may be sensitive to the choice of link function. We review the practical implications of different link functions for regression of the absolute risk (or cumulative incidence) of an event. Specifically, we consider models in which the regression coefficients β have the following interpretation: The probability of dying from cause D during the next t years changes with a factor exp(β) for a one unit change of the corresponding predictor variable, given fixed values for the other predictor variables. The models have a direct interpretation for the predictive ability of the risk factors. We propose some tools to justify the models in comparison with traditional approaches that combine a series of cause-specific Cox regression models or use the Fine-Gray model. We illustrate the methods with the use of bone marrow transplant data.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22865706      PMCID: PMC4547456          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  Competing risks as a multi-state model.

Authors:  Per Kragh Andersen; Steen Z Abildstrom; Susanne Rosthøj
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Interpretability and importance of functionals in competing risks and multistate models.

Authors:  Per Kragh Andersen; Niels Keiding
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function.

Authors:  John P Klein; Per Kragh Andersen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Applications of crude incidence curves.

Authors:  E L Korn; F J Dorey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Efron-type measures of prediction error for survival analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A Gerds; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Boosting for high-dimensional time-to-event data with competing risks.

Authors:  Harald Binder; Arthur Allignol; Martin Schumacher; Jan Beyersmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  Pseudo-observations in survival analysis.

Authors:  Per Kragh Andersen; Maja Pohar Perme
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Quantifying the predictive accuracy of time-to-event models in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  Rotraut Schoop; Jan Beyersmann; Martin Schumacher; Harald Binder
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Analyzing Competing Risk Data Using the R timereg Package.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheike; Mei-Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.440

10.  Summarizing differences in cumulative incidence functions.

Authors:  Mei-Jie Zhang; Jason Fine
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  32 in total

1.  Pseudo-observations for competing risks with covariate dependent censoring.

Authors:  Nadine Binder; Thomas A Gerds; Per Kragh Andersen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Survival analysis in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

3.  Incidence of Incisional Hernia Repair After Laparoscopic Compared to Open Resection of Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of 17,717 Patients.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen; Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen; Peter-Martin Krarup; Lars Nannestad Jorgensen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Comparison of stopped Cox regression with direct methods such as pseudo-values and binomial regression.

Authors:  Hans C van Houwelingen; Hein Putter
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Random survival forests for competing risks.

Authors:  Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas A Gerds; Udaya B Kogalur; Richard D Moore; Stephen J Gange; Bryan M Lau
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Joint Inference for Competing Risks Survival Data.

Authors:  Gang Li; Qing Yang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Weighted NPMLE for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk.

Authors:  Anna Bellach; Michael R Kosorok; Ludger Rüschendorf; Jason P Fine
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Incisional hernias after open versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian K Jensen; Peter-Martin Krarup; Thomas Scheike; Lars N Jorgensen; Tommie Mynster
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Thromboembolism in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of NOPHO ALL2008 protocol treatment in patients aged 1 to 45 years.

Authors:  Cecilie Utke Rank; Nina Toft; Ruta Tuckuviene; Kathrine Grell; Ove Juul Nielsen; Thomas Leth Frandsen; Hanne Vibeke Hansen Marquart; Birgitte Klug Albertsen; Ulf Tedgård; Helene Hallböök; Ellen Ruud; Kirsten Brunsvig Jarvis; Petter Quist-Paulsen; Pasi Huttunen; Ulla Wartiovaara-Kautto; Ólafur Gísli Jónsson; Sonata Saulyte Trakymiene; Laimonas Griškevičius; Kadri Saks; Mari Punab; Kjeld Schmiegelow
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Decreased risk of surgery for small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery compared with open surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen; Peter Andersen; Rune Erichsen; Thomas Scheike; Lene Hjerrild Iversen; Peter-Martin Krarup
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.