Literature DB >> 31745375

Joint Inference for Competing Risks Survival Data.

Gang Li1, Qing Yang2.   

Abstract

This article develops joint inferential methods for the cause-specific hazard function and the cumulative incidence function of a specific type of failure to assess the effects of a variable on the time to the type of failure of interest in the presence of competing risks. Joint inference for the two functions are needed in practice because (i) they describe different characteristics of a given type of failure, (ii) they do not uniquely determine each other, and (iii) the effects of a variable on the two functions can be different and one often does not know which effects are to be expected. We study both the group comparison problem and the regression problem. We also discuss joint inference for other related functions. Our simulation shows that our joint tests can be considerably more powerful than the Bonferroni method, which has important practical implications to the analysis and design of clinical studies with competing risks data. We illustrate our method using a Hodgkin disease data and a lymphoma data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cause-specific hazard; Censoring; Cox’s model; Cumulative incidence; Log-rank test; Subdistribution hazard

Year:  2016        PMID: 31745375      PMCID: PMC6863485          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1093942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  21 in total

1.  Regression modeling of competing crude failure probabilities.

Authors:  J P Fine
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis.

Authors:  Jan Beyersmann; Aurélien Latouche; Anika Buchholz; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Applying competing risks regression models: an overview.

Authors:  Bernhard Haller; Georg Schmidt; Kurt Ulm
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Proportional subdistribution hazards modeling offers a summary analysis, even if misspecified.

Authors:  Nadine Grambauer; Martin Schumacher; Jan Beyersmann
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Analyzing Competing Risk Data Using the R timereg Package.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheike; Mei-Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data?

Authors:  M S Pepe; M Mori
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Applying Cox regression to competing risks.

Authors:  M Lunn; D McNeil
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Effect of overweight on kidney transplantation outcome.

Authors:  A Sancho; A Avila; E Gavela; S Beltrán; J E Fernández-Nájera; P Molina; J F Crespo; L M Pallardó
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Absolute risk regression for competing risks: interpretation, link functions, and prediction.

Authors:  Thomas A Gerds; Thomas H Scheike; Per K Andersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Flexible competing risks regression modeling and goodness-of-fit.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheike; Mei-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  1 in total

1.  On correlation rank screening for ultra-high dimensional competing risks data.

Authors:  Xiaolin Chen; Chenguang Li; Tao Zhang; Zhenlong Gao
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 1.416

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.