Literature DB >> 22865276

Two- versus three-dimensional dual gradient-echo MRI of the liver: a technical comparison.

Michael A Fischer1, Olivio F Donati, Natalie Chuck, Iris N Blume, Roger Hunziker, Hatem Alkadhi, Daniel Nanz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2D spoiled dual gradient-echo (SPGR-DE) and 3D SPGR-DE with fat and water separation for the assessment of focal and diffuse fatty infiltration of the liver.
METHODS: A total of 227 consecutive patients (141 men; 56 ± 14 years) underwent clinically indicated liver MRI at 1.5 T including multiple-breath-hold 2D SPGR-DE and single-breath-hold 3D SPGR-DE with automatic reconstruction of fat-only images. Two readers assessed the image quality and number of fat-containing liver lesions on 2D and 3D in- and opposed-phase (IP/OP) images. Liver fat content (LFC) was quantified in 138 patients without chronic liver disease from 2D, 3D IP/OP, and 3D fat-only images.
RESULTS: Mean durations of 3D and 2D SPGR-DE acquisitions were 23.7 ± 2.9 and 97.2 ± 9.1 s respectively. The quality of all 2D and 3D images was rated diagnostically. Three-dimensional SPGR-DE revealed significantly more breathing artefacts resulting in lower image quality (P < 0.001); 2D and 3D IP/OP showed a similar detection rate of fat-containing lesions (P = 0.334) and similar LFC estimations (mean: +0.4 %; P = 0.048). LFC estimations based on 3D fat-only images showed significantly higher values (mean: 2.7 % + 3.5 %) than those from 2D and 3D IP/OP images (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Three dimensional SPGR-DE performs as well as 2D SPGR-DE for the assessment of focal and diffuse fatty infiltration of liver parenchyma. The 3D SPGR-DE sequence used was quicker but more susceptible to breathing artefacts. Significantly higher LFC values are derived from 3D fat-only images than from 2D or 3D IP/OP images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22865276     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2614-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Liver fat: effect of hepatic iron deposition on evaluation with opposed-phase MR imaging.

Authors:  Antonio C A Westphalen; Aliya Qayyum; Benjamin M Yeh; Raphael B Merriman; Julie A Lee; Amit Lamba; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL.

Authors:  Hyeonjin Kim; Sara E Taksali; Sylvie Dufour; Douglas Befroy; T Robin Goodman; Kitt Falk Petersen; Gerald I Shulman; Sonia Caprio; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Kristina I Ringe; Daniela B Husarik; Claude B Sirlin; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Pilot study assessing differentiation of steatosis hepatis, hepatic iron overload, and combined disease using two-point dixon MRI at 3 T: in vitro and in vivo results of a 2D decomposition technique.

Authors:  Daniel T Boll; Daniele Marin; Grace M Redmon; Stephen I Zink; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique for contrast agent enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Jingfei Ma; Anthony T Vu; Jong Bum Son; Haesun Choi; John D Hazle
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  MRI: the new reference standard in quantifying hepatic steatosis?

Authors:  Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Michael Alexander Fischer; Rolf Graf; Daniel Nanz; Achim Weber; Wolfgang Moritz; Yinghua Tian; Christian Eugen Oberkofler; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy accurately estimate the severity of steatosis provided the stage of fibrosis is considered.

Authors:  Stuart McPherson; Julie R Jonsson; Gary J Cowin; Peter O'Rourke; Andrew D Clouston; Andrew Volp; Leigh Horsfall; Dinesh Jothimani; Jonathan Fawcett; Graham J Galloway; Mark Benson; Elizabeth E Powell
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Fatty liver disease: MR imaging techniques for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis.

Authors:  Fiona Hughes Cassidy; Takeshi Yokoo; Lejla Aganovic; Robert F Hanna; Mark Bydder; Michael S Middleton; Gavin Hamilton; Alyssa D Chavez; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Characterization of adrenal lesions: comparison of 2D and 3D dual gradient-echo MR imaging at 3 T--preliminary results.

Authors:  Daniele Marin; Brian J Soher; Brian M Dale; Daniel T Boll; Richard S Youngblood; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Repeatability of two-dimensional chemical shift imaging multivoxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for measuring human cerebral choline-containing compounds.

Authors:  Basant K Puri; Mary Egan; Fintan Wallis; Philip Jakeman
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-22

2.  Age- and Gender Dependent Liver Fat Content in a Healthy Normal BMI Population as Quantified by Fat-Water Separating DIXON MR Imaging.

Authors:  Erika J Ulbrich; Michael A Fischer; Andrei Manoliu; Magda Marcon; Roger Luechinger; Daniel Nanz; Caecilia S Reiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.