Literature DB >> 20308498

Pilot study assessing differentiation of steatosis hepatis, hepatic iron overload, and combined disease using two-point dixon MRI at 3 T: in vitro and in vivo results of a 2D decomposition technique.

Daniel T Boll1, Daniele Marin, Grace M Redmon, Stephen I Zink, Elmar M Merkle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether two-point Dixon MRI using a 2D decomposition technique facilitates metabolite differentiation between lipids and iron in standardized in vitro liver phantoms with in vivo patient validation and allows semiquantitative in vitro assessment of metabolites associated with steatosis, iron overload, and combined disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The acrylamide-based phantoms were made to reproduce the T1- and T2-weighted MRI appearances of physiologic hepatic parenchyma and hepatic steatosis-iron overload by the admixture of triglycerides and ferumoxides. Combined disease was simulated using joint admixtures of triglycerides and ferumoxides at various concentrations. For phantom validation, 30 patients were included, of whom 10 had steatosis, 10 had iron overload, and 10 had no liver disease. For MRI an in-phase/opposed-phase T1-weighted sequence with TR/TE(opposed-phase)/TE(in-phase) of 4.19/1.25/2.46 was used. Fat/water series were obtained by Dixon-based algorithms. In-phase and opposed-phase and fat/water ratios were calculated. Statistical cluster analysis assessed ratio pairs of physiologic liver, steatosis, iron overload, and combined disease in 2D metabolite discrimination plots.
RESULTS: Statistical assessment proved that metabolite decomposition in phantoms simulating steatosis (1.77|0.22; in-phase/opposed-phase|fat/water ratios), iron overload (0.75|0.21), and healthy control subjects (1.09|0.05) formed three clusters with distinct ratio pairs. Patient validation for hepatic steatosis (3.29|0.51), iron overload (0.56|0.41), and normal control subjects (0.99|0.05) confirmed this clustering (p < 0.001). One-dimensional analysis assessing in vitro combined disease only with in-phase/opposed-phase ratios would have failed to characterize metabolites. The 2D analysis plotting in-phase/opposed-phase and fat/water ratios (2.16|0.59) provided accurate semiquantitative metabolite decomposition (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: MR Dixon imaging facilitates metabolite decomposition of intrahepatic lipids and iron using in vitro phantoms with in vivo patient validation. The proposed decomposition technique identified distinct in-phase/opposed-phase and fat/water ratios for in vitro steatosis, iron overload, and combined disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308498     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative proton MR techniques for measuring fat.

Authors:  H H Hu; H E Kan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Newer CT applications and their alternatives: what is appropriate in children?

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

3.  Automated two-point dixon screening for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and siderosis: comparison with R2-relaxometry and chemical shift-based sequences.

Authors:  B Henninger; H Zoller; S Rauch; M Schocke; S Kannengiesser; X Zhong; G Reiter; W Jaschke; C Kremser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-echo (in- and opposed-phase) T1-weighted gradient recalled echo for detection and grading of hepatic iron using quantitative and visual assessment.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; John Ryan; Maneesh Khanna; Vivek Virmani; Leonard Avruch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Two- versus three-dimensional dual gradient-echo MRI of the liver: a technical comparison.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Olivio F Donati; Natalie Chuck; Iris N Blume; Roger Hunziker; Hatem Alkadhi; Daniel Nanz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.